Utility / owner / operatorORInvestor-owned utilityHow EIA classifies an organization, such as a public utility, cooperative or investor-owned company.Definition ↗
Operated nameplate capacity, operating generatorsFull nameplate MW of operating generators at plants this organization runs, including shares held by other owners.Definition ↗
3,601.7MW
Source & method
Sum of operating generator nameplate MW at plants where this organization is the reported operator
2024 inventory · reported · derived · valid · final
23 of 23 plants included.
Reported operating capacity; partial plant/unit coverage is marked
Owned nameplate capacity, operating generatorsOperating generator nameplate MW multiplied by this organization’s ownership share, once per generator. This can include plants another organization operates.Definition ↗
3,690.5MW
Source & method
Sum over operating generators of nameplate MW x this organization's ownership fraction (reported schedule or EIA-860 schedule-4 default)
2024 inventory · reported · derived · valid · final
Example: an operating 100 MW generator with a 25% ownership share contributes 25 MW to owned capacity. Its operator counts the full 100 MW. Neither quantity establishes who buys its electricity.
Operates
Operating MWFull operating nameplate capacity at plants this organization runs, including shares held by other owners.Definition ↗
Share-weighted MWAn organization with a reported share of a generator. Owned MW applies that share to operating nameplate capacity; it does not establish who buys the output.Definition ↗
Disclosed supply · Washington fuel mixA supplier’s reported sources of electricity sold to Washington customers, grouped by fuel.Definition ↗
Not a Washington retail supplier in the Fuel Mix Disclosure extracts (CY2014–CY2024 loaded), or not linked by the reviewed claimant crosswalk
Oregon supply · DEQ supplier reportingOregon DEQ's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program: every utility and electricity service supplier serving Oregon end users reports the MWh it delivered to them by source, and DEQ computes the emissions from its own emission factors and publishes both per supplier (OAR 340-215-0120). Bonneville Power Administration purchases are their own category. A different basis from Washington's fuel mix disclosure, and not a compliance determination.Definition ↗
2024 · Oregon end users
Electricity supplied to Oregon end users
20,993,316MWh
2024
Source & method
Oregon DEQ Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (OAR 340-215-0120): the MWh DEQ lists for the supplier's electricity delivered to Oregon end users in the year, from specified sources (at the busbar, or with DEQ's 2% transmission-loss factor) and unspecified purchases; for a multi-jurisdictional utility, its Oregon retail sales including losses. Not generation, and not Washington's retail-sales basis
2024 calendar year · reported · direct · valid · final
Oregon DEQ Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program: the anthropogenic emissions DEQ's reporting system computes for the electricity the supplier delivered to Oregon end users, each source's MWh times DEQ's emission factor (unspecified power 0.428 t CO2e/MWh; a multi-jurisdictional utility's system factor applied to its Oregon MWh). An attribution from emission factors, not a stack measurement, and not a compliance determination under ORS 469A.410
2024 calendar year · estimated · direct · valid · final
Oregon DEQ's Emission Intensity column: the anthropogenic emissions it attributes to the supplier's Oregon deliveries divided by those MWh, as DEQ publishes it
2024 calendar year · estimated · direct · valid · final
Bonneville Power Administration: 1.5% of the MWh DEQ lists; unspecified purchases: 14.6%.Listed by DEQ as “Portland General Electric (PGE)” (investor owned utility).
By year MWh supplied to Oregon end users and the emissions DEQ attributes to them; not generation, not a compliance finding
Oregon supply by year, on DEQ's basis
Year
Supplied · MWh
Emissions · t CO2e
Intensity · t CO2e/MWh
Fuel types · share of MWh
BPA · share
Unspecified · share
2019 on: by fuel type
2024
20,993,316 MWh
6,078,895 t CO2e
0.29 t CO2e/MWh
Natural Gas 41.6% · Hydro 21.1% · Unspecified 14.6%
1.5%
14.6%
2023
20,521,683 MWh
6,560,987 t CO2e
0.32 t CO2e/MWh
Natural Gas 43.5% · Unspecified 16.0% · Hydro 14.2%
5.6%
16.0%
2022
20,439,051 MWh
6,007,046 t CO2e
0.294 t CO2e/MWh
Natural Gas 34.0% · Unspecified 20.7% · Hydro 17.7%
8.4%
20.7%
2021
19,427,308 MWh
6,116,380 t CO2e
0.315 t CO2e/MWh
Natural Gas 39.8% · Unspecified 17.3% · Hydro 15.8%
4.3%
17.3%
2020
18,897,455 MWh
6,632,254 t CO2e
0.351 t CO2e/MWh
Natural Gas 35.3% · Unspecified 20.9% · Hydro 15.1%
5.3%
20.9%
2019
18,131,567 MWh
7,578,660 t CO2e
0.418 t CO2e/MWh
Natural Gas 42.2% · Coal 19.0% · Unspecified 13.2%
4.3%
13.2%
Before 2019: totals onlyDEQ publishes fuel types from 2019, “when data collection was standardized in the Your DEQ Online reporting system” (workbook, Data Information)
2018
17,559,580 MWh
6,543,702 t CO2e
0.373 t CO2e/MWh
—
2017
17,524,383 MWh
6,172,870 t CO2e
0.352 t CO2e/MWh
—
2016
17,280,893 MWh
6,500,099 t CO2e
0.376 t CO2e/MWh
—
2015
18,218,774 MWh
7,493,290 t CO2e
0.411 t CO2e/MWh
—
2014
17,885,893 MWh
6,840,611 t CO2e
0.382 t CO2e/MWh
—
2013
19,246,780 MWh
6,955,556 t CO2e
0.361 t CO2e/MWh
—
2012
19,390,618 MWh
7,084,166 t CO2e
0.365 t CO2e/MWh
—
2011
20,035,982 MWh
8,235,219 t CO2e
0.411 t CO2e/MWh
—
2010
18,763,099 MWh
9,481,692 t CO2e
0.505 t CO2e/MWh
—
DEQ's basis (OAR 340-215-0120): electricity the supplier delivered to Oregon end users in the year, from specified sources (at the busbar, or with DEQ's 2% transmission-loss factor) and unspecified purchases, and the anthropogenic emissions DEQ's reporting system computes for it from DEQ's emission factors (unspecified power 0.428 t CO2e/MWh). A multi-jurisdictional utility reports its whole system and its Oregon retail sales including losses, and DEQ applies the system's factor to the Oregon figure. Not generation, not Washington's disclosure (a different basis, never added to it), and not a compliance determination.
Fuel types as DEQ names them: Bonneville Power Administration, Powerex and Tacoma are purchases from those systems, kept as their own categories and never resolved to plants; shares are of the MWh DEQ lists for the supplier, computed here from DEQ's rows.
Carbon allowances · no-cost allocationAn emissions allowance Washington assigns to an eligible utility without charge. It is not measured emissions.Definition ↗
Not a CETA-obligated electric utility in Ecology's allowance schedule (or not linked by the reviewed crosswalk); only Washington retail utilities subject to the Clean Energy Transformation Act receive no-cost allowances. Checked wa-ecology-cca-allowances 2026-09-18
Money · FERC Form 1The annual financial report large investor-owned utilities file with the federal energy regulator.Definition ↗
2025 · USD nominal
Purchased power, settlements
801,985,468USD
2025
Source & method
FERC Form 1 Schedule 326 total settlement over named sellers (adjustment rows excluded), nominal dollars for the report year
2025 calendar year · reported · derived · valid · final
135 of 135 native rows included.
129 named sellers; 3 adjustment and 1 market-settlement rows and the filing total row excluded
Purchased power by seller Financial relationshipA documented financial relationship between named parties, with an amount where public and its reported or calculated basis.Definition ↗
Schedule 326 settlements for 2025, largest first(top 60 of 129). Seller names as filed; a link means a reviewed match to an organization in this atlas.
Seller (as filed)
Type
MWh
USD
USD/MWh
Grant PUD ↗ filed as “grant county, pud no. 2, washington”
california independent system operatorSF · market operator, not a bilateral seller
45,458,838 USD
Adjustment rows filed on the same schedule (3)
nvpc monet qf deferralsno type · a mechanism, not a party
648,000 USD
pcam deferralsAD · a mechanism, not a party
3,812,852 USD
carbon allowance expenseno type · a mechanism, not a party
-3,469,992 USD
Missing cells stay missing; partial seller sums are marked and have no USD/MWh ratio. FERC Form 1 Schedule 326 rows for the report year; seller names as filed; an organization link exists only through a reviewed crosswalk row; MWh uses purchased_mwh through 2020 and purchased other than storage from 2021. A row counts as a seller when it names a party, whatever its purchase type: FERC's AD code marks an adjusting entry, and an adjusting entry naming a company is still money between that company and the respondent. Rows whose name is a mechanism (deferrals, allowances, the residential exchange) are listed as adjustments; rows naming a market operator are listed as market settlements
Revenue by customer class
Class
USD
MWh
USD/MWh
Customers (avg/month)
residential sales
1,427,684,968USD
7,596,298MWh
187.94 USD/MWh
840,457customers (monthly average)
small or commercial
966,187,754USD
6,425,897MWh
150.36 USD/MWh
114,676customers (monthly average)
large or industrial
560,496,980USD
5,904,529MWh
94.93 USD/MWh
285customers (monthly average)
public street and highway lighting
14,976,918USD
41,443MWh
361.39 USD/MWh
236customers (monthly average)
sales for resale
406,261,710USD
9,856,351MWh
41.22 USD/MWh
40customers (monthly average)
Schedule 300 class lines as the form computes them (as_computed); usd_per_mwh is revenue over MWh sold for that class; the class lines are not re-summed here; EIA-861 revenue and price for the same utility are on the retail block and can differ (different survey, scope and year)
Operation and maintenance expenses
Total electric O&Mas the form computes it
2,287,363,048 USD
Power productionas the form computes it
1,503,322,001 USD
of which purchased power (account 555)reported line· account 555
823,981,794 USD
of which fuel, steam generation (501)reported line· account 501
45,578,906 USD
of which fuel, other generation (547)reported line· account 547
430,180,885 USD
Transmissionas the form computes it
166,944,422 USD
Distributionas the form computes it
246,386,322 USD
Customer accountsas the form computes it
56,376,921 USD
Customer service and informationas the form computes it
26,317,568 USD
Salesas the form computes it
0 USD
Administrative and general, operationas the form computes it
263,473,546 USD
Administrative and general, maintenanceas the form computes it· account 935
20,358,329 USD
of which transmission by others (565)reported line· account 565
142,765,434 USD
Schedule 320 electric operation and maintenance: function totals as the form computes them (as_computed) with the purchased power, fuel and wheeling accounts listed beneath as components, never added again
Nominal dollars for the report year as filed; revisions arrive for months after the April deadline; the pinned PUDL release fixes the snapshot FERC respondent 250· XBRL entity C001132; link basis: pudl_assn_1to1.
Retail electricity sold
Full serviceA utility that sells electricity to customers. Full-service sales include both electricity and delivery.Definition ↗
Average revenue per kWhRevenue divided by electricity sold. This average is not a tariff or a household bill.Definition ↗ is realized revenue ÷ sales, not a tariff.
OR · commercial
Retail sales
6,433,391MWh
2024
Source & method
EIA-861 electricity sold to ultimate customers for the stated utility, state, customer class and service type; calendar year
2024 calendar year · reported · direct · valid · final
Sold to retail customers in the stated state (utility x state grain); bundled full-service rows only in the summaries; energy-only and delivery-only rows are listed but never added to bundled sales. Realized average revenue per kWh is not a tariff.
Power interruptions reported
2024 · as filed on EIA-861
SAIDISystem Average Interruption Duration Index: the minutes of sustained interruption the average customer had over the year, customer-minutes interrupted divided by customers served. Each utility calculates and reports its own figure on EIA-861 Schedule 3, under the method it declares. A system average says nothing about one address.Definition ↗, SAIFISystem Average Interruption Frequency Index: how many sustained interruptions the average customer had over the year, customers interrupted divided by customers served, as the utility reports it on EIA-861 Schedule 3.Definition ↗ and CAIDICustomer Average Interruption Duration Index: minutes per sustained interruption, SAIDI divided by SAIFI on the same basis. EIA-861 asks utilities for SAIDI and SAIFI only; EIA publishes CAIDI with the data and the atlas shows it as published, never recomputed.Definition ↗ count sustained interruptions. Figures with and without major event daysDays a utility sets apart from normal operation: EIA describes them as events such as snowstorms, floods or heatwaves, or periods of outages that differ greatly from the utility's own five-year history. EIA-861 asks for the indices both with and without them. Part B respondents determine them under IEEE 1366; Part C respondents define a major event themselves. The two series answer different questions and are never blended.Definition ↗ are different measures; compare like with like.
OR · IEEE 1366EIA-861 Schedule 3 has two parts. Part B is for utilities that calculate SAIDI and SAIFI and determine major event days under IEEE 1366-2003 or IEEE 1366-2012; Part C is for any other method, where the utility also states how it defines a momentary interruption and whether inactive accounts count as customers. Figures from the two parts are not comparable and the atlas never pools them; utilities under Part C do not share one method either.Definition ↗
Index
Major event days included
Major event days excluded
Included, loss of supply removed
SAIDIminutes/customer/year
772
133
739
SAIFIinterruptions/customer/year
1.27
0.79
1.12
CAIDIminutes/interruption
607.9
168.4
659.8
Customers the indices are based on
942,296 customers
Highest voltage counted as distribution
35 kV
How it was measuredDetermined under IEEE 1366-2003 or IEEE 1366-2012; the form does not record which edition
Outages recorded automatically: yes
Others reporting the same way · major event days included12 utilities in OR under IEEE 1366. Each counts once whatever its size; this is context, not a ranking.
SAIDI median 439.1 (28.2–1,482.5) minutes/customer/yearSAIFI median 1.34 interruptions/customer/year
Others reporting the same way · major event days excluded11 utilities in OR under IEEE 1366. Each counts once whatever its size; this is context, not a ranking.
SAIDI median 107.6 (11.6–517.9) minutes/customer/yearSAIFI median 0.79 interruptions/customer/year
Every year filed
As filed each year. SAIDI in minutes per customer per year; SAIFI in interruptions per customer per year. Blank cells were not reported.
Year
State
Standard
SAIDI with
SAIDI without
SAIFI with
SAIFI without
Customers
2024
OR
IEEE 1366
772
133
1.27
0.79
942,296
2023
OR
IEEE 1366
109
109
0.65
0.65
931,537
2022
OR
IEEE 1366
349
117
1.11
0.64
926,001
2021
OR
IEEE 1366
2,724
119
1.67
0.63
913,801
2020
OR
IEEE 1366
312
100
0.81
0.6
900,756
2019
OR
IEEE 1366
128
98
0.71
0.61
884,690
2018
OR
IEEE 1366
88
88
0.52
0.52
875,224
2017
OR
IEEE 1366
350
113
1.04
0.62
861,353
2016
OR
IEEE 1366
169
97
0.79
0.59
846,178
2015
OR
IEEE 1366
175
75
0.78
0.48
866,029
2014
OR
IEEE 1366
245
93
1.2
0.69
866,398
2013
OR
IEEE 1366
205
62
0.57
0.45
841,127
Reported by the utility on EIA-861 Schedule 3 under the method it declares. IEEE 1366 and other-method figures are not comparable, and values with and without major event days answer different questions. A system average says nothing about one address. CAIDI is published by EIA as SAIDI divided by SAIFI; it is not a line on the form. A value the utility left blank stays blank. Source and licence· Frozen facts for this utility ↗
Customer programmes
EIA-861 Schedule 6, as filed
Programme results as each utility filed them, by customer class and report year, each in its own unit. Classes are never added into a total, years are never added into a period, and savings are never divided by sales. The one ratio shown, enrolled demand-response customers against the utility's own EIA-861 customer count for the same state, class and year, carries both counts.
Energy efficiency EIA-861 Schedule 6 Part A
Reported by the utility on EIA-861 Schedule 6 Part A as adjusted gross savings at the customer meter under its own evaluation; figures are not comparable across utilities. Reporting-year incremental savings are annualized for participants new that year; life-cycle savings run over the programmes' planned life (energy as a lump sum, peak as the average annual reduction). Each class is shown as filed and the total row is the filer's own; nothing is summed here. Costs are nominal dollars of the report year (the form collects thousands; PUDL publishes dollars). A blank stays blank.
Report year 2014, OR. Each row is one customer class as filed; the filer's total is its own line and is not the sum of the rows above. Costs are nominal dollars.
Class
Incremental annual energy savings, reporting year (annualized)MWh
Customer incentives, incremental life-cycle cost (nominal)USD · life cycle
Other costs, incremental life-cycle (nominal)USD · life cycle
Other costs, reporting-year incremental (nominal)USD
CommercialPGE
0 MWh
0 MW
0 MWh
0 MW
0 years
$0
$0
$0
$0
IndustrialPGE
0 MWh
0 MW
0 MWh
0 MW
0 years
$0
$0
$0
$0
ResidentialPGE
0 MWh
0 MW
0 MWh
0 MW
0 years
$0
not reported
not reported
$0
TransportationPGE
not reported
not reported
not reported
not reported
0 years
not reported
not reported
not reported
not reported
Filer's totalPGE
0 MWh
0 MW
0 MWh
0 MW
not applicable
$0
$0
$0
$0
Demand response EIA-861 Schedule 6 Part B
Reported by the utility on EIA-861 Schedule 6 Part B. Potential peak savings assume every programme is called; actual peak savings are what was achieved at the company's own annual peak hour, and the two are never merged. Customers are enrolled customers, a count. Costs are nominal dollars of the report year. The form has no total row and none is computed here. A blank stays blank.
Report year 2024, OR. Each row is one customer class as filed; the form has no total row and none is computed. Costs are nominal dollars.
Class
Customers enrolled in demand response programmescount
Energy savings from demand responseMWh
Potential peak demand savings, all demand response calledMW · potential
Actual peak demand savings at the annual system peak hourMW · achieved
Customer incentives (nominal)USD
Other programme costs (nominal)USD
Enrolled share of this class's customersderived
CommercialPGE
1,140
not reported
73 MW
not reported
$3,290,950
$2,470,030
1%1,140 of 109,692
IndustrialPGE
not reported
not reported
not reported
not reported
not reported
not reported
not reported
ResidentialPGE
192,617
not reported
81.7 MW
not reported
$2,391,369
$1,867,366
23.2%192,617 of 828,857
TransportationPGE
not reported
not reported
not reported
not reported
not reported
not reported
not reported
Population: organizations of this release with EIA-861 rows in the core states. A short-form respondent has no figures to file; a long-form respondent without a row may have no programmes or may have a nonutility administrator reporting for it. Years without a row are listed against the table's span, not against the years this utility filed the form.
What the sheet says
TariffA utility’s published rates and charges, with an effective date.Definition ↗ · not a bill
0.11289 USD/kWh before Schedule 100 = transmission 0.00805 + distribution 0.06941 + energy 0.03543; time-of-day option on-peak 0.30263, mid 0.11143, off-peak 0.05514
Adjustment schedules named on the sheetlisted, never added in
Schedule 100 supplemental adjustments
3rd revision of Sheet 7-1. The schedule PDF is a content-asset URL whose hash changes per revision, so the stable reference is the tariff index, which lists every schedule and its current asset.Source sheet ↗read 2026-09-18· OpenEI entry ↗ dated 2026-01-01, a discovery index only
ModeledComputed billsA declared usage case priced on a published tariff sheet: kWh in one bill, the days it covers, and where the sheet has them a service size, dwelling type or jurisdiction and a season. The total is the schedule's own charges: the fixed charge plus the energy charge by tier. Where the same sheet prints prices for named adjustments or credits, a second, separately labelled total adds them; those prices change on their own schedules. Whatever the sheet only names, such as a city tax, is listed and never added, so neither total is a complete bill. It is an illustration, not a billing record, and it is not the realized average revenue per kWh that EIA-861 reports.Definition ↗ for 3 declared cases · Single-Family Home. Prices are the sheet’s own; usage and days are assumptions.
Case
Schedule charges (USD)
With adjustments the sheet prices (USD)
Next kWh costs (USD/kWh)
Average (cents/kWh)
600 kWh over 30 days
$80.74
None priced on this sheet
$0.11289
13.46schedule charges ÷ kWh
900 kWh over 30 days
$114.61
None priced on this sheet
$0.11289
12.73schedule charges ÷ kWh
1,200 kWh over 30 days
$148.47
None priced on this sheet
$0.11289
12.37schedule charges ÷ kWh
How each total adds up
600 kWh over 30 days
Line
Quantity
Price
Amount (USD)
Basic Charge
1 month
$13.0000 per month
$13.00
Transmission and Related Services Charge
600 kWh
$0.00805 per kWh
$4.83
Distribution Charge
600 kWh
$0.06941 per kWh
$41.65
Energy Charge
600 kWh
$0.03543 per kWh
$21.26
Schedule charges
$80.74
900 kWh over 30 days
Line
Quantity
Price
Amount (USD)
Basic Charge
1 month
$13.0000 per month
$13.00
Transmission and Related Services Charge
900 kWh
$0.00805 per kWh
$7.25
Distribution Charge
900 kWh
$0.06941 per kWh
$62.47
Energy Charge
900 kWh
$0.03543 per kWh
$31.89
Schedule charges
$114.61
1,200 kWh over 30 days
Line
Quantity
Price
Amount (USD)
Basic Charge
1 month
$13.0000 per month
$13.00
Transmission and Related Services Charge
1,200 kWh
$0.00805 per kWh
$9.66
Distribution Charge
1,200 kWh
$0.06941 per kWh
$83.29
Energy Charge
1,200 kWh
$0.03543 per kWh
$42.52
Schedule charges
$148.47
Named on the sheet without a price, so in neither total: Schedule 100 adjustments. This sheet prices no adjustment, so there is no second total.
Schedule 203· Net Metering Service· effective 2024-01-01
Excess kilowatt-hour credits left at the end of the March billing period are transferred to the company's low income assistance programme at the average annual Schedule 201 avoided cost rate and the customer's balance resets to zero, under OAR 860-039-0060. The annual cycle runs from the April billing period
Oregon sends the leftover credit to a low-income programme; Washington's utilities keep it. The schedule PDF is a content-asset URL whose hash changes per revision.Source ↗read 2026-09-18
The price on the utility's own sheet on the date it was read, with the adjustment schedules it names listed beside it and never added in. It is not a bill, and it is not the realized average revenue per kWh that EIA-861 reports above: the two answer different questions.
Distributed generationCustomer-sited and small generation reported by utilities in aggregate on EIA-861; no locations; a separate population from the plant inventory, never added to it.Definition ↗
Utility reports · no locations
Distributed generation reported by this utility to EIA-861 for 2024, by state
Utility-reported, no locations, not in the EIA-860 plant inventory (>= 1 MW). Storage is listed separately and never added to generation capacity. Non-net-metered units >= 1 MW can also appear in EIA-860; the overlap is disclosed, not resolved. Source rollup rows are excluded from every sum.
Sum of EIA-861 utility-reported nameplate capacity over leaf technology classes, excluding storage and source rollup rows; utility x state grain; no locations; not part of the EIA-860 plant inventory
2024 calendar year · reported · derived · valid · final
1 of 1 reporting utilities included.
net-metered + non-net-metered; the two EIA-861 schedules are disjoint by design
Customer counts can include the same customer under more than one technology. Energy sold to utilities measures exports; it does not measure all generation at customer sites.
Net-metered customers
29,689count
2024
Source & method
EIA-861 net metering customer count over leaf technology classes; a customer with two technologies can be counted twice by the source
2024 calendar year · reported · derived · valid · final
Distributed-generation screeningA utility's published first look at whether a distribution feeder can take more generation, such as rooftop or community solar: the loads it metered on the feeder, the generation already connected and queued, and its own readiness and generation-limited classifications, at one date. PGE publishes one twice a year. It is not available hosting capacity, not a study of any site and not an interconnection approval.Definition ↗
2026-07-22 · Portland General Electric’s own figures
The feeders PGE files under one substation, BROOKWOOD in Hillsboro, Oregon (PGE's substation layer, Public_Data layer 6, FACILITYID 4185)
Edition in this release: PGE Distribution System Data 07-22-2026 · data date 2026-07-22 (from the layer name) · DG status updated 2026-07-22 · retrieved 2026-09-29
One row per feeder as Portland General Electric publishes it, each figure in its own unit. Feeders are measured at their own times, so no row is added to another and no total is shown; MVA is never added to MW. The readiness and generation-limited flags are Portland General Electric’s own classifications, shown as set.
Feeder
Feeder voltagekV
Feeder peak loadMVA
Net daytime minimum loadMW
Distributed generation connectedMW
Distributed generation in queueMW
Portland General Electric’s classifications
SCADAPGE: whether the feeder is monitored and operated by supervisory control and data acquisition (user guide page 12).as Portland General Electric lists it
Note from Portland General Electric
DG status updated
Feeder DG readyPGE: the feeder has protection installed to support backfeed to the transformer (a line VT and relays capable of Mirror Bit transfer trip). Other constraints, such as thermal limits, can still require upgrades (user guide page 13; FAQ page 2).
Transformer DG readyPGE: the substation transformer has protection installed to support backfeed onto the transmission system (user guide page 13).
Generation limitedPGE: generation on the feeder or its transformer has reached PGE's screening threshold of generation to load (at least 90% in the user guide, more than 90% in the FAQ) without the protection to support backfeed, so more inverter-based generation needs upgrades first (user guide page 13; FAQ page 2). PGE's result, never recomputed here.
Additional distributed generation a feeder or transformer could accept. PGE does not publish it: its FAQ (January 16, 2026, pages 2–3) says a DG Ready feeder can accept up to 80% of its thermal rating absent other constraints, and that the map and its data "do not provide the information necessary to quantify this amount". Never derived here from net daytime minimum load, queued MW or a readiness flag
2026-07-22 · reported · direct · missing · final
PGE's map and data carry no thermal ratings, which is what a figure would need; a pre-application report or an interconnection study answers it for a site. Nothing here is an interconnection approval.
PGE Distribution System Data 07-22-2026; no field; FAQ January 16, 2026, pages 2–3
No total: PGE measures each feeder at its own time, so the figures are never added across feeders, and MVA is never added to MW.
Nothing is subtracted: net daytime minimum load less queued generation is not available capacity, and PGE's flags are shown as PGE set them.
This is PGE's screening at one date, not an interconnection approval, not a study of any site and not a guarantee of present capacity.
PGE's own screening of the feeders it files under one substation, as its public map data states them at one date. Loads are metered at or near the feeder breaker; a reported zero is PGE's figure and a blank note means PGE gave no explanation, neither of which says a feeder is idle. Each polygon PGE publishes is the feeder buffered by 500 feet, not a surveyed line or a service boundary.
DISCLAIMER: The graphic representations and other information/data contained herein (collectively the “depiction”) is the property of PGE. The depiction is made available for your review for informational purposes only. Information derived from GIS data is subject to change. The depiction is provided “as is” without any guarantee, representation or warranty of any kind, either express, implied, or statutory. PGE assumes no liability with respect to any reliance you place on the depiction.
Display names and aliases (pipeline/config/crosswalks/aliases.csv)
Display names verified against each organization's own website; EIA legal names retained as aliases
A display name is the name an organization uses for itself; the EIA name stays searchable and on the record. Each row cites the page that shows the name.
Catalyst Cooperative, PUDL v2026.9.0, derived from U.S. EIA Forms 860/923
Data transformed by PUDL from U.S. EIA forms; selected fields republished; EIA data is public with dated acknowledgment (https://www.eia.gov/about/copyrights_reuse.php)
Catalyst Cooperative, PUDL v2026.9.0, derived from U.S. EIA Forms 860/923
Data transformed by PUDL from U.S. EIA forms; selected fields republished; EIA data is public with dated acknowledgment (https://www.eia.gov/about/copyrights_reuse.php)
Catalyst Cooperative, PUDL v2026.9.0, derived from U.S. EIA Form 861
Data transformed by PUDL from U.S. EIA forms; selected fields republished; EIA data is public with dated acknowledgment (https://www.eia.gov/about/copyrights_reuse.php)
Catalyst Cooperative, PUDL v2026.9.0, derived from U.S. EIA Form 861
Data transformed by PUDL from U.S. EIA forms; selected fields republished; EIA data is public with dated acknowledgment (https://www.eia.gov/about/copyrights_reuse.php)
Catalyst Cooperative, PUDL v2026.9.0, derived from U.S. EIA Form 861
Data transformed by PUDL from U.S. EIA forms; selected fields republished; EIA data is public with dated acknowledgment (https://www.eia.gov/about/copyrights_reuse.php)
Catalyst Cooperative, PUDL v2026.9.0, derived from U.S. EIA Forms 860/923
Data transformed by PUDL from U.S. EIA forms; selected fields republished; EIA data is public with dated acknowledgment (https://www.eia.gov/about/copyrights_reuse.php)
PGE Distribution System Data (the Distributed Generation Evaluation Map's feeder layer), layer 0, the feeders PGE files under substation BROOKWOOD
Portland General Electric, Distributed Generation Evaluation Map data (PGE Distribution System Data)
DISCLAIMER: The graphic representations and other information/data contained herein (collectively the “depiction”) is the property of PGE. The depiction is made available for your review for informational purposes only. Information derived from GIS data is subject to change. The depiction is provided “as is” without any guarantee, representation or warranty of any kind, either express, implied, or statutory. PGE assumes no liability with respect to any reliance you place on the depiction. (Item terms, quoted.) PGE's screening of one feeder at one date: peak load in MVA, net daytime minimum load and connected and queued distributed generation in MW, nominal voltage in kV, and PGE's own readiness and generation-limited classifications. PGE does not publish available hosting capacity, so none is shown or derived here, and nothing here is an interconnection approval or a guarantee of present capacity. Feeder figures are not added together. PGE's user guide and FAQ are linked, not reproduced.
2010-2024 Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Electricity Use (ghgElectricityEms.xlsx; sheets Emissions and Power by Year and Raw Data 2019-2024), last modified 2026-06-15
Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, 2010-2024 Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Electricity Use
Each electricity supplier's electricity delivered to Oregon end users in MWh, and the anthropogenic emissions DEQ computes for it in metric tons CO2e from its own emission factors, by year, and by fuel type from 2019 (OAR 340-215-0120). Specified sources are reported at the busbar or with DEQ's 2% transmission-loss factor; unspecified purchases carry 0.428 t CO2e/MWh; a multi-jurisdictional utility reports its whole system and its Oregon retail sales including losses, and DEQ applies the system's factor to the Oregon figure. Bonneville Power Administration, Powerex and Tacoma are fuel types in DEQ's workbook and stay their own categories, never resolved to plants. Not generation, not Washington's Fuel Mix Disclosure (a different basis), and not a compliance determination.