Avista native-load forecast (energy and peak)
Each vintage's Expected Case is the issuer's own expectation for a target year on the day it filed the plan: annual energy in MWa, and a winter and a summer peak in MW at the issuer's planning weather. A later vintage restates the expectation; the difference between vintages is a change in what the issuer expected, never a measured change in electricity use. Draft and final editions are separate vintages. Scenarios are kept under the issuer's own labels beside the Expected Case and never merged with it.
Issuer: Avista Corp · Geography: Avista's native load: its retail customers in Washington and Idaho, as the 2025 IRP defines it (Chapter 3, PDF page 110): 'The forecast is for Avista's native load, referring to Avista's retail customers, and does not include other loads within the transmission balancing authority published in FERC or EIA data'
Why this forecast, and the rules
The only Northwest utility whose four public IRP editions (2021, 2023, draft 2025, final 2025) print the same table on the same basis, in the same units, for the same geography: native-load annual energy (aMW) and winter and summer peak (MW) by year to 2045; the 2025 IRP also states in words what its native load excludes. The Council's Ninth Plan draft prints its regional energy forecast by named future only as charts (Appendix F, Figures F-34 to F-43) and its one table (F-14) is a peak averaged across all futures, while the 2021 Plan states a prose range (20,986 aMW in 2018 to 22,000-26,000 aMW by 2041); the Council's per-future workbooks, acquired 2026-09-22, are a frozen-efficiency planning input for its own balancing-authority zones rather than an issuer's expectation across vintages, so they sit beside this ledger on their own basis, not in it.
- draft final: A draft and a final edition are separate vintages with their own issue dates; a zero revision between them is recorded, not dropped.
- outcomes: An observed value sits beside a forecast only where the two share a basis; otherwise it is published on its own basis with the reason and no difference. A difference between a comparable outcome and a forecast carries weather as well as forecast error.
- revision: A later vintage's value minus an earlier vintage's, for the same scenario, geography, metric, unit and target year, is a revision of what the issuer expected. It is not a measured change in electricity use, and it is never computed across scenarios, geographies, metrics or units.
- scenarios: Every scenario the document labels is listed under the issuer's own label. A scenario the document draws but prints no value for is an explicit absence (chart_only), never filled from the chart.
- units: MWa is annual average energy, MW is a peak, MWh is energy over a period. None is converted to another on a fact; an annual MWa derived from MWh uses that year's hours.
- withdrawn: A withdrawn expectation stays in the ledger flagged with its reason; it is excluded from revisions and never deleted.
Editions
4 vintages- 2021 Electric Integrated Resource Plan finalfiled with the Washington UTC (docket UE-200301) and the Idaho PUC on this date; PDF creation date 2021-03-25· WUTC UE-2003012021-04-01Document ↗
- 2023 Electric Integrated Resource Plan finalfiled with the Washington UTC (docket UE-200301) and the Idaho PUC on this date; PDF creation date 2023-05-24· WUTC UE-2003012023-06-01Document ↗
- Draft 2025 Electric Integrated Resource Plan draftcover date October 1, 2024; filed in WUTC docket UE-230793 on 2024-10-01· WUTC UE-2307932024-10-01Document ↗
- 2025 Electric Integrated Resource Plan finalfiled with the Washington UTC (docket UE-230793) on this date and with the Idaho PUC; PDF creation date 2024-12-19· WUTC UE-2307932024-12-302025 Electric IRP Appendix G, load-forecast-and-scenarios.xlsx ↗·2025 Electric Integrated Resource Plan ↗
Annual energy · Expected Case
Modeled MWa| Edition | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | 2030 | 2035 | 2045 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-01final | 1,107 | 1,115 | 1,117 | 1,125 | 1,133 | 1,166 |
| 2023-06-01final | 1,121 | 1,126 | 1,132 | 1,161 | 1,207 | 1,342 |
| 2024-10-01draft | — | — | 1,165 | 1,165 | 1,200 | 1,379 |
| 2024-12-30final | — | — | 1,165 | 1,165 | 1,200 | 1,379 |
| Revision, first to latestderived; a change in expectation | +14 MWa | +11 MWa | +48 MWa | +40 MWa | +67 MWa | +213 MWa |
Summer peak · Expected Case
Modeled MW| Edition | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | 2030 | 2035 | 2045 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-01final | 1,638 | 1,643 | 1,648 | 1,670 | 1,702 | 1,811 |
| 2023-06-01final | 1,670 | 1,684 | 1,697 | 1,745 | 1,855 | 2,177 |
| 2024-10-01draft | — | — | 1,837 | 1,863 | 1,905 | 2,217 |
| 2024-12-30final | — | — | 1,837 | 1,863 | 1,905 | 2,217 |
| Revision, first to latestderived; a change in expectation | basis changed | basis changed | basis changed | basis changed | basis changed | basis changed |
Basis change 2021-04-01 → 2023-06-01: "summer peak of native load, July, at planning temperature (1-in-2)" became "summer peak of native load at the issuer's planning temperature; the table names no month".
Basis change 2023-06-01 → 2024-10-01: "summer peak of native load at the issuer's planning temperature; the table names no month" became "summer peak of native load, August, at the warmest average August day (1-in-2)".
Winter peak · Expected Case
Modeled MW| Edition | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | 2030 | 2035 | 2045 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-01final | 1,729 | 1,733 | 1,738 | 1,756 | 1,783 | 1,882 |
| 2023-06-01final | 1,728 | 1,736 | 1,743 | 1,790 | 1,886 | 2,212 |
| 2024-10-01draft | — | — | 1,816 | 1,814 | 1,893 | 2,261 |
| 2024-12-30final | — | — | 1,816 | 1,814 | 1,893 | 2,261 |
| Revision, first to latestderived; a change in expectation | basis changed | basis changed | basis changed | basis changed | basis changed | basis changed |
Basis change 2021-04-01 → 2023-06-01: "winter peak of native load, January, at planning temperature (1-in-2)" became "winter peak of native load at the issuer's planning temperature; the table names no month".
Basis change 2023-06-01 → 2024-10-01: "winter peak of native load at the issuer's planning temperature; the table names no month" became "winter peak of native load, January, at the average coldest January day (1-in-2)".
Filed once, in the 2024-12-30 edition
Modeled no earlier edition to revise from| Scenario | 2026 | 2030 | 2035 | 2045 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High Load Growth | 1,165derived | 1,218derived | 1,291derived | 1,651derived |
| Low Load Growth | 1,165derived | 1,154derived | 1,156derived | 1,250derived |
| RCP 8.5 Weather | 1,165derived | 1,154derived | 1,187derived | 1,370derived |
| System Bldg Electrification & High Transportation Electrification | 1,166derived | 1,192derived | 1,308derived | 1,566derived |
| System Bldg Electrification & High Transportation Electrification with RCP 8.5 weather | 1,165derived | 1,183derived | 1,323derived | 1,714derived |
| WA Building Electrification | 1,165derived | 1,180derived | 1,241derived | 1,490derived |
| WA Bldg Electrification & High Transportation Electrification | 1,166derived | 1,192derived | 1,308derived | 1,566derived |
| Scenario | 2026 | 2030 | 2035 | 2045 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expected Case | 9,832,307derived | 9,828,751derived | 10,118,614derived | 11,638,923derived |
| High Load Growth | 9,832,307derived | 10,275,446derived | 10,883,858derived | 13,900,341derived |
| Low Load Growth | 9,832,307derived | 9,734,345derived | 9,755,086derived | 10,542,732derived |
| RCP 8.5 Weather | 9,832,307derived | 9,736,432derived | 10,015,366derived | 11,533,200derived |
| System Bldg Electrification & High Transportation Electrification | 9,841,354derived | 10,046,745derived | 11,009,267derived | 13,149,549derived |
| System Bldg Electrification & High Transportation Electrification with RCP 8.5 weather | 9,844,896derived | 10,098,642derived | 11,439,071derived | 14,848,878derived |
| WA Building Electrification | 9,832,307derived | 9,947,258derived | 10,456,814derived | 12,521,795derived |
| WA Bldg Electrification & High Transportation Electrification | 9,841,064derived | 10,046,745derived | 11,009,267derived | 13,149,549derived |
| Scenario | 2026 | 2030 | 2035 | 2045 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High Load Growth | 1,843 | 1,940 | 2,074 | 2,711 |
| Low Load Growth | 1,837 | 1,845 | 1,837 | 2,024 |
| RCP 8.5 Weather | 1,843 | 1,871 | 1,939 | 2,287 |
| System Bldg Electrification & High Transportation Electrification | 1,838 | 1,878 | 2,000 | 2,378 |
| System Bldg Electrification & High Transportation Electrification with RCP 8.5 weather | 1,842 | 1,875 | 2,018 | 2,548 |
| WA Building Electrification | 1,837 | 1,866 | 1,913 | 2,238 |
| WA Bldg Electrification & High Transportation Electrification | 1,838 | 1,878 | 2,000 | 2,378 |
| Scenario | 2026 | 2030 | 2035 | 2045 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High Load Growth | 1,813 | 1,884 | 2,001 | 2,617 |
| Low Load Growth | 1,816 | 1,791 | 1,804 | 2,003 |
| RCP 8.5 Weather | 1,818 | 1,804 | 1,877 | 2,238 |
| System Bldg Electrification & High Transportation Electrification | 1,816 | 1,870 | 2,098 | 2,717 |
| System Bldg Electrification & High Transportation Electrification with RCP 8.5 weather | 1,816 | 1,888 | 2,178 | 3,084 |
| WA Building Electrification | 1,816 | 1,860 | 2,024 | 2,597 |
| WA Bldg Electrification & High Transportation Electrification | 1,816 | 1,870 | 2,098 | 2,717 |
Beside it: Northwest Power and Conservation Council, zone WA_AVA (Avista Corp)
Modeled draftNot comparable. The Council's WA_AVA is a balancing-authority zone, not Avista's native load: its README lists the zones under 'Balancing Authorities' (DemandForecast_README.xlsx Glossary!G13; WA_AVA 'Avista Corp' at G21:H21) and its model is built on each balancing authority's load history from EIA's Hourly Electric Grid Monitor, reducing only PACE and NWMT to their in-region share (draft Ninth Plan Appendix F, PDF page 7), whereas Avista's native load 'does not include other loads within the transmission balancing authority published in FERC or EIA data' (2025 IRP, PDF page 110). The two differ mostly by that geography, not because the forecasters disagree. The bases differ as well: the Council freezes equipment efficiency levels so its resource model can choose efficiency afterwards (Glossary!B3), while Avista's baseline includes projected naturally occurring energy efficiency (2025 IRP, PDF page 106); the Council's peak is the single highest hour of each year under one climate model's weather, while Avista's are a January and an August peak at planning temperatures (PDF page 110); the Council's energy Total_Load includes hydrogen-production load (H2_Load, Glossary!E25; up to 63 MWa of WA_AVA's 2045 total under HighGrowth and LateGrowth), and its peak workbooks have no hydrogen column; and the Council's plan is a draft open for comment until 2026-10-16. Each is published on its own basis and no difference is computed.
Frozen efficiency: equipment efficiency levels are held fixed so the Council's resource model can choose cost-effective efficiency afterwards; the final sales forecast comes only at the end of the planning cycle (Glossary!B3). A planning input, not a sales forecast and not a utility's expectation. The Council's values sit beside the issuer's latest final edition, for the target years both print, each on its own basis. Every future pathway under every climate model is shown as printed: none is averaged, ranged or picked, no difference is taken against the issuer, and the Council's single annual peak hour is never set against the issuer's seasonal peaks. Beside each total sit its incremental data-centre and hydrogen-production components from the same row; the total includes them, and nothing is subtracted from it.
| Metric | 2030 | 2035 | 2045 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual energy | 1,165 MWa | 1,200 MWa | 1,379 MWa |
| Winter peak | 1,814 MW | 1,893 MW | 2,261 MW |
| Summer peak | 1,863 MW | 1,905 MW | 2,217 MW |
| Future pathway · climate model | 2030 | 2035 | 2045 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Early GrowthCL-A | 1,548 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 0 MWa | 1,638 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 0 MWa | 1,883 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 0 MWa |
| Early GrowthCL-C | 1,533 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 0 MWa | 1,619 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 0 MWa | 1,858 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 0 MWa |
| Early GrowthCL-G | 1,553 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 0 MWa | 1,647 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 0 MWa | 1,901 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 0 MWa |
| High GrowthCL-A | 1,614 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 2 MWa | 1,788 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 17 MWa | 2,194 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 63 MWa |
| High GrowthCL-C | 1,593 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 2 MWa | 1,759 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 17 MWa | 2,151 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 63 MWa |
| High GrowthCL-G | 1,615 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 2 MWa | 1,790 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 17 MWa | 2,200 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 63 MWa |
| Late GrowthCL-A | 1,614 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 2 MWa | 1,788 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 17 MWa | 2,194 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 63 MWa |
| Late GrowthCL-C | 1,593 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 2 MWa | 1,759 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 17 MWa | 2,151 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 63 MWa |
| Late GrowthCL-G | 1,615 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 2 MWa | 1,790 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 17 MWa | 2,200 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 63 MWa |
| Low GrowthCL-A | 1,460 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 0 MWa | 1,527 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 0 MWa | 1,761 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 0 MWa |
| Low GrowthCL-C | 1,443 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 0 MWa | 1,506 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 0 MWa | 1,735 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 0 MWa |
| Low GrowthCL-G | 1,465 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 0 MWa | 1,536 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 0 MWa | 1,780 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 0 MWa |
| Mixed BagCL-A | 1,556 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 0 MWa | 1,656 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 0 MWa | 1,928 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 0 MWa |
| Mixed BagCL-C | 1,540 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 0 MWa | 1,636 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 0 MWa | 1,902 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 0 MWa |
| Mixed BagCL-G | 1,560 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 0 MWa | 1,665 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 0 MWa | 1,945 MWaincremental data centres 0 MWahydrogen production 0 MWa |
| Future pathway · climate model | 2030 | 2035 | 2045 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Early GrowthCL-A | 2,453 MW2030-01-31 07:00:00 PSTincremental data centres 0 MW | 2,561 MW2035-08-23 16:00:00 PDTincremental data centres 0 MW | 2,995 MW2045-08-20 17:00:00 PDTincremental data centres 0 MW |
| Early GrowthCL-C | 2,339 MW2030-07-10 17:00:00 PDTincremental data centres 0 MW | 2,520 MW2035-08-23 17:00:00 PDTincremental data centres 0 MW | 3,066 MW2045-12-18 18:00:00 PSTincremental data centres 0 MW |
| Early GrowthCL-G | 2,480 MW2030-08-02 16:00:00 PDTincremental data centres 0 MW | 2,514 MW2035-07-02 17:00:00 PDTincremental data centres 0 MW | 3,087 MW2045-01-31 18:00:00 PSTincremental data centres 0 MW |
| High GrowthCL-A | 2,653 MW2030-01-31 09:00:00 PSTincremental data centres 0 MW | 2,879 MW2035-08-23 17:00:00 PDTincremental data centres 0 MW | 3,671 MW2045-08-20 17:00:00 PDTincremental data centres 0 MW |
| High GrowthCL-C | 2,474 MW2030-07-10 17:00:00 PDTincremental data centres 0 MW | 2,801 MW2035-08-23 17:00:00 PDTincremental data centres 0 MW | 3,632 MW2045-12-18 09:00:00 PSTincremental data centres 0 MW |
| High GrowthCL-G | 2,626 MW2030-08-02 17:00:00 PDTincremental data centres 0 MW | 2,742 MW2035-07-02 17:00:00 PDTincremental data centres 0 MW | 3,554 MW2045-07-27 18:00:00 PDTincremental data centres 0 MW |
| Late GrowthCL-A | 2,653 MW2030-01-31 09:00:00 PSTincremental data centres 0 MW | 2,879 MW2035-08-23 17:00:00 PDTincremental data centres 0 MW | 3,671 MW2045-08-20 17:00:00 PDTincremental data centres 0 MW |
| Late GrowthCL-C | 2,474 MW2030-07-10 17:00:00 PDTincremental data centres 0 MW | 2,801 MW2035-08-23 17:00:00 PDTincremental data centres 0 MW | 3,632 MW2045-12-18 09:00:00 PSTincremental data centres 0 MW |
| Late GrowthCL-G | 2,626 MW2030-08-02 17:00:00 PDTincremental data centres 0 MW | 2,742 MW2035-07-02 17:00:00 PDTincremental data centres 0 MW | 3,554 MW2045-07-27 18:00:00 PDTincremental data centres 0 MW |
| Low GrowthCL-A | 2,332 MW2030-01-31 07:00:00 PSTincremental data centres 0 MW | 2,394 MW2035-08-23 17:00:00 PDTincremental data centres 0 MW | 2,815 MW2045-01-11 18:00:00 PSTincremental data centres 0 MW |
| Low GrowthCL-C | 2,209 MW2030-07-10 17:00:00 PDTincremental data centres 0 MW | 2,355 MW2035-08-23 17:00:00 PDTincremental data centres 0 MW | 2,882 MW2045-12-18 18:00:00 PSTincremental data centres 0 MW |
| Low GrowthCL-G | 2,343 MW2030-08-02 16:00:00 PDTincremental data centres 0 MW | 2,353 MW2035-07-02 17:00:00 PDTincremental data centres 0 MW | 2,907 MW2045-01-31 18:00:00 PSTincremental data centres 0 MW |
| Mixed BagCL-A | 2,457 MW2030-01-31 07:00:00 PSTincremental data centres 0 MW | 2,584 MW2035-08-23 17:00:00 PDTincremental data centres 0 MW | 3,069 MW2045-01-11 18:00:00 PSTincremental data centres 0 MW |
| Mixed BagCL-C | 2,349 MW2030-07-10 17:00:00 PDTincremental data centres 0 MW | 2,545 MW2035-08-23 17:00:00 PDTincremental data centres 0 MW | 3,145 MW2045-12-18 18:00:00 PSTincremental data centres 0 MW |
| Mixed BagCL-G | 2,488 MW2030-08-02 16:00:00 PDTincremental data centres 0 MW | 2,538 MW2035-07-02 17:00:00 PDTincremental data centres 0 MW | 3,165 MW2045-01-31 18:00:00 PSTincremental data centres 0 MW |
The Council's WA_AVA workbooks print the same values for High Growth and Late Growth in every year from 2027 to 2046, under every climate model; both are shown as printed.
The Council's futures and climate models
- Early Growth: Rapid early demand growth primarily from data centers (Glossary!E8)
- High Growth: Consistently higher demand growth throughout the 20-year planning horizon (Glossary!E6)
- Late Growth: Increasing demand growth mid to late in the horizon, primarily from building electrification (Glossary!E9)
- Low Growth: Consistently lower demand growth throughout the 20-year planning horizon (Glossary!E7)
- Mixed Bag: Middle of the road growth (Glossary!E10)
- CL-A: CanESM2_BCSD - Canadian Centre for Climate Modeling and Analysis generated with the RCP 8.5 (business as usual case). Downscaled Method = BCSD (Glossary!E14)
- CL-C: CCSM4_BCSD - National Center for Atmospheric Research generated with the RCP 8.5 (business as usual emissions level). Downscaling Method = BCSD (Glossary!E15)
- CL-G: CNRM-CM5_MACA - Centre National de Recherches Meteorologiques generated with the RCP 8.5 (business as usual emissions level). Downscaling Method = MACA (Glossary!E16)
Northwest Power and Conservation Council, draft Ninth Northwest Power Plan (document 2026-3, cover date August 12, 2026), frozen-efficiency demand forecast workbooks. Draft Ninth Northwest Power Plan (Council document 2026-3) ↗ ·The Council's own demand-forecast folder (28 workbooks) ↗ ·What the atlas reads from these workbooks· council-ninth-demand-wa-ava-energy· council-ninth-demand-wa-ava-peak
What was later observed
Each entry is on its own stated basis. A difference appears only where the entry is comparable; one that is not comparable carries the reason and no difference.
- 2021 Summer peak · reportedAvista's all-time peak load during the June 2021 heat dome (average temperature 93 F, high of 109 F, against a planning temperature of 84 F) Not comparable: the 2021 vintage's summer figure is a July monthly peak at planning temperature; this outcome is the seasonal maximum, which fell in June; no difference is computed Recorded because it is the issuer's own statement of an outcome in the first forecast year of the 2021 vintage; 2021 is not a ledger target year, so it stands beside the ledger, not against a row.1,889 MWSource ↗
- 2024 Winter peak · reportedJanuary 2024 peak load of native load corrected for the curtailed industrial load, as the issuer states it (its historical peak series is 'corrected for known curtailed load or demand response', footnote 38) against the 2021-04-01 edition (1,729 MW): +252 MW; against the 2023-06-01 edition (1,728 MW): +253 MW. A difference carries weather as well as forecast error. Two issuer figures for one event: the official peak (1,869 MW) and the curtailment-corrected peak (1,981 MW). Both are kept; neither is chosen.1,981 MWSource ↗
- 2024 Winter peak · reportedofficial January 2024 peak load of native load, after industrial curtailment (Martin Luther King Jr. holiday weekend cold event) against the 2021-04-01 edition (1,729 MW): +140 MW; against the 2023-06-01 edition (1,728 MW): +141 MW. A difference carries weather as well as forecast error. The issuer states the event 'would have been Avista's all-time peak ... at a load of 1,981 MW, but industrial loads were curtailed resulting in an official peak load of 1,869 MW'.1,869 MWSource ↗
- 2024 Annual energy · reportedEIA-930 reported demand of balancing authority AVA over calendar 2024 (UTC): the mean over 8,777 of the year's 8,784 hours; the 7 reported hours EIA marked by publishing its own imputed value are left out, never substituted Not comparable: The issuer excludes 'other loads within the transmission balancing authority published in FERC or EIA data' from its native load (2025 IRP, PDF page 110); EIA-930 demand for the AVA balancing authority includes them. The observed value is published on its own basis and no difference is computed.1,474 MWapudl-930-operations
- 2025 Annual energy · reportedEIA-930 reported demand of balancing authority AVA over calendar 2025 (UTC): the mean over 8,757 of the year's 8,760 hours; the 3 reported hours EIA marked by publishing its own imputed value are left out, never substituted Not comparable: The issuer excludes 'other loads within the transmission balancing authority published in FERC or EIA data' from its native load (2025 IRP, PDF page 110); EIA-930 demand for the AVA balancing authority includes them. The observed value is published on its own basis and no difference is computed.1,487 MWapudl-930-operations
- 2024 Annual energy · reportedEIA-861 retail sales to ultimate customers of utility 20169 summed over states ID, MT, WA and customer classes for calendar 2024, divided by the year's 8784 hours; its delivery-only rows, energy other suppliers sold over its wires, are left out Not comparable: EIA-861 retail sales are metered at the customer and exclude losses; native load is measured at the system and includes them (the 2025 IRP workbook forecasts retail sales as a separate series, on which a future comparison can stand once a forecast year is observed). Published on its own basis; no difference is computed.1,072 MWapudl-retail-sales
Shown only as charts, or absent
- 2021-04-01 final · high growth Higher service-area employment growth (1.90%/yr) and population growth (1.20%/yr) than the Expected Case (1.00%, 0.80%); energy shown as a chart (Figure 3.13) and peak as 1-in-20 bounds (Figure 3.22); no value by year is printedchart only
- 2021-04-01 final · low growth Lower service-area employment growth (0.40%/yr) and population growth (0.50%/yr) than the Expected Case; chart only, no value by year is printedchart only
- 2023-06-01 final · high ev adoption Charts only (Figures 2.26-2.28)chart only
- 2023-06-01 final · high growth U.S. GDP growth 2.4%/yr and service-area population growth 1.1%/yr against the Expected Case's 1.8% and 0.8% (Table 2.5); average annual native-load growth 2023-2045 of 1.11% against 0.85% expected (Table 2.6); energy shown as a chart (Figure 2.19), no value by year is printedchart only
- 2023-06-01 final · low growth U.S. GDP growth 1.2%/yr and population growth 0.3%/yr (Table 2.5); average annual native-load growth 0.53% (Table 2.6); chart onlychart only
- 2023-06-01 final · transformative Charts only (Figures 2.29-2.31)chart only
- 2023-06-01 final · wa full building electrification Compared with the Expected Case in energy and winter peak as charts (Figures 2.20-2.22); no value by year is printedchart only
- 2023-06-01 final · wa hybrid building electrification Charts only (Figures 2.23-2.25)chart only
Release 20260929T050546Z-51ae0f7d3c78