Utility / owner / operatorWAPolitical subdivision (e.g. public utility district)How EIA classifies an organization, such as a public utility, cooperative or investor-owned company.Definition ↗Consumer-ownedUtilities owned by the public they serve: municipal, cooperative, public utility district and other political subdivisions, state and federal. A grouping the atlas defines from EIA's owner types.Definition ↗
Operated nameplate capacity, operating generatorsFull nameplate MW of operating generators at plants this organization runs, including shares held by other owners.Definition ↗
132.8MW
Source & method
Sum of operating generator nameplate MW at plants where this organization is the reported operator
2024 inventory · reported · derived · valid · final
8 of 8 plants included.
Reported operating capacity; partial plant/unit coverage is marked
Owned nameplate capacity, operating generatorsOperating generator nameplate MW multiplied by this organization’s ownership share, once per generator. This can include plants another organization operates.Definition ↗
132.8MW
Source & method
Sum over operating generators of nameplate MW x this organization's ownership fraction (reported schedule or EIA-860 schedule-4 default)
2024 inventory · reported · derived · valid · final
Example: an operating 100 MW generator with a 25% ownership share contributes 25 MW to owned capacity. Its operator counts the full 100 MW. Neither quantity establishes who buys its electricity.
Operates
Operating MWFull operating nameplate capacity at plants this organization runs, including shares held by other owners.Definition ↗
Share-weighted MWAn organization with a reported share of a generator. Owned MW applies that share to operating nameplate capacity; it does not establish who buys the output.Definition ↗
Through BPA: 86.9% of sales; unspecified purchases: 10.3%. Filed as claimant “Snohomish County PUD #1”.
By report year MWh and shares of Washington retail sales including losses; not generation, not a compliance finding
Each year as Commerce's fuel-mix system holds it: MWh and shares of the utility's Washington retail sales including line losses, never generation and never a compliance finding. Years before CY2018 are Commerce's restatement under the 2019 method, not the disclosure published for the year; no change is taken across that break.
Disclosed supply by report year
Report year
Washington retail sales · MWh
Mix · share of Washington sales
Through BPA · share
Unspecified · share
CY2018 onUnspecified power is disclosed as its own category, as the statute has required since ESHB 1428 (2019); Commerce's statutory aggregate carries an unspecified row from CY2018. CY2022-Aggregate Fuel Mix Time Series.xlsx ↗ (Info!A10; Info!A16)
CY2024
6,950,952 MWh
Hydro 66.6% · Nuclear 11.2% · Market 10.3%
86.9%
10.3%
CY2023
6,850,465 MWh
Hydro 68.1% · Nuclear 9.8% · Market 9.3%
86.6%
9.3%
CY2022
7,026,998 MWh
Hydro 74.6% · Nuclear 9.4% · Wind 8.2%
86.1%
3.5%
CY2021
6,857,393 MWh
Hydro 83.8% · Nuclear 10.5% · Market 4.4%
96.0%
4.4%
CY2020
6,632,870 MWh
Hydro 73.8% · Wind 10.9% · Nuclear 9.3%
85.3%
3.8%
CY2019
6,879,512 MWh
Hydro 76.0% · Nuclear 10.5% · Wind 7.8%
91.4%
4.9%
CY2018
6,660,024 MWh
Hydro 79.6% · Nuclear 9.8% · Wind 7.0%
91.9%
2.5%
Before CY2018: restatedCommerce's current system run over what utilities reported for a year before CY2018. The disclosure published for that year followed the old law, which required Commerce to assign fuel shares to unspecified power; this run keeps unspecified power as its own Market category, and Commerce's statewide totals for these years differ from the statutory reports. Not the label customers received, and not comparable with CY2018 on. CY2022-Aggregate Fuel Mix Time Series.xlsx ↗ (Info!A10; Info!A16)
Categories and shares as Commerce computed them from declared resources, the BPA system mix (BPA's own mix applied to BPA deliveries, remainder unspecified) and unspecified purchases; a declared resource needs ownership or an auditable contract and its REC; renewable power without the REC counts as unspecified. Not an emissions accounting.
Carbon allowances · no-cost allocationAn emissions allowance Washington assigns to an eligible utility without charge. It is not measured emissions.Definition ↗
Cap-and-investWashington’s program that limits covered greenhouse gas emissions and requires allowances for them.Definition ↗ period 1 · t CO2e
No-cost carbon allowances
394,381t CO2e
2023 calendar year
Source & method
Ecology's Electric Utility Allowance Allocation Schedule under WAC 173-446-230: allowances allocated at no cost to a CETA-obligated electric utility for the calendar year, one allowance = one metric ton of CO2 equivalent. An allocation computed from Ecology's forecast of the utility's Washington retail load and resource supply, not measured emissions and not a cap on the utility
2023 calendar year · reported · direct · valid · final
sheet AllowanceAllocation; Snohomish County PUD #1; 2023
Ecology's Electric Utility Allowance Allocation Schedule under WAC 173-446-230: allowances allocated at no cost to a CETA-obligated electric utility for the calendar year, one allowance = one metric ton of CO2 equivalent. An allocation computed from Ecology's forecast of the utility's Washington retail load and resource supply, not measured emissions and not a cap on the utility
2024 calendar year · reported · direct · valid · final
sheet AllowanceAllocation; Snohomish County PUD #1; 2024
Ecology's Electric Utility Allowance Allocation Schedule under WAC 173-446-230: allowances allocated at no cost to a CETA-obligated electric utility for the calendar year, one allowance = one metric ton of CO2 equivalent. An allocation computed from Ecology's forecast of the utility's Washington retail load and resource supply, not measured emissions and not a cap on the utility
2025 calendar year · reported · direct · valid · final
sheet AllowanceAllocation; Snohomish County PUD #1; 2025
Ecology's Electric Utility Allowance Allocation Schedule under WAC 173-446-230: allowances allocated at no cost to a CETA-obligated electric utility for the calendar year, one allowance = one metric ton of CO2 equivalent. An allocation computed from Ecology's forecast of the utility's Washington retail load and resource supply, not measured emissions and not a cap on the utility
2026 calendar year · reported · direct · valid · final
sheet AllowanceAllocation; Snohomish County PUD #1; 2026
The utility's no-cost allocation for the year multiplied by the settlement price of the most recent quarterly Cap-and-Invest auction. An illustration of scale, not revenue received: a utility consigns only part of its allocation, the price changes every quarter, and the proceeds of any sale must go back to customers
2026 calendar year · reported · derived · valid · final
2026 allocation at the $39.50 settlement price of auction #15 on 2026-09-02
auction #15 2026-09-02; Snohomish County PUD #1; 2026
At the settlement price of $39.50 per allowance from auction #15 on 2026-09-02 (Ecology’s summary report ↗), where 3,484,205 allowances were sold on behalf of consigning entities statewide. What the allocation would fetch at one auction's price. Utilities consign part of their allowances to these auctions and must return the proceeds to customers; the rest they hold for compliance or bank.
Allocated to “Snohomish County PUD #1” on Ecology’s schedule, filed as consumer-owned utility. A utility cannot sell these allowances to another company: it uses them for compliance, banks them, transfers them to an eligible generator, or consigns them to a quarterly auction, and the proceeds must go back to customers.
How Ecology computed each year
Year
Forecast WA load (MWh)
Forecast supply
Allowances (t CO2e)
Forecast filed in
2023
6,867,948MWh
Bonneville Power Administration 95.0% · Unspecified market purchases 5.0%
394,381t CO2e
SupF
2024
6,932,388MWh
Bonneville Power Administration 95.0% · Unspecified market purchases 5.0%
394,601t CO2e
SupF
2025
7,053,614MWh
Bonneville Power Administration 95.0% · Renewable or non-emitting 0.0% · Unspecified market purchases 5.0%
Supply shares are Ecology’s forecast for the allocation, taken from the utility’s own filing. They are not the disclosed fuel mix above, which reports what was actually sold.
An allocation of allowances, not a measurement of emissions and not a cap on the utility. Ecology computes it from its forecast of the utility's Washington retail load and resource supply, and reissues the schedule as forecasts and the BPA emission factor change; the supply shares here are that forecast, not the disclosed fuel mix.
Money · FERC Form 1The annual financial report large investor-owned utilities file with the federal energy regulator.Definition ↗
FERC Form 1: not a respondent (public power, cooperative, federal or non-utility); checked PUDL v2026.9.0 respondent list 2026-09-18
Federal supply (BPA)
BPA customer 10354 ·checked 2026-09-27
What BPA sets (products, high water marks, demand quantities and forecasts, from BPA's own workbooks and letters), what the utility reports paying, and Washington's disclosure attribution beside them: separate quantities with separate periods, none derived from another.
Slice/BlockA BPA power product that delivers planned amounts rather than following the customer's load: a Block of fixed amounts together with a Slice, a share of the federal system's output. BPA's customer products list writes it Slice.Definition ↗ · Regional Dialogue contract Product change close-out letter (2024-08-19) ↗ page 1, first paragraph (printed “the Slice/Block product”) · Customer Products List (2022-12-30) ↗ page 4, row 132 (printed “Slice”)
until Sep 2025
Load FollowingA BPA power product that meets the customer's retail load hour by hour, less the resources it dedicates to that load, rather than delivering a forecast annual amount as the Slice/Block product does.Definition ↗ · Regional Dialogue contract Product change close-out letter (2024-08-19) ↗ page 1, third paragraph (printed “the Load Following product”) · Customer Products List (2025-10-01) ↗ page 3, row 81 · Snohomish County PUD 2025 Annual Report ↗ Note 8, Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Power Purchase Agreement, page 62 (PDF page 66) (printed “Load-Following”)
Oct 2025–Sep 2028
Load FollowingA BPA power product that meets the customer's retail load hour by hour, less the resources it dedicates to that load, rather than delivering a forecast annual amount as the Slice/Block product does.Definition ↗ · Provider of Choice contract Snohomish County PUD 2025 Annual Report ↗ Note 8, Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Power Purchase Agreement, page 62 (PDF page 66) (printed “Load-Following”)
Oct 2028–Sep 2044
What BPA sets RHWMThe most power, in average megawatts, a BPA preference customer may buy at the Tier 1 rate in each year of a rate period, set in a BPA process before each rate period from the customer's Contract High Water Mark. A cap on eligibility, not a delivery, a purchase or a bill.Definition ↗ and CHWMA BPA customer's maximum eligibility for power at the Tier 1 rate under its contract, in average megawatts. Regional Dialogue CHWMs date from 2011; the Provider of Choice CHWMs, calculated once in fiscal 2026 and published final on 2026-05-28, govern contracts delivering from October 2028. Not a current delivery right.Definition ↗: caps on eligibility, not deliveries or purchases
Rate Period High Water Mark for the FY 2026-2028 rate period
803.675MWa
FY2026–FY2028 rate period (Oct 2025–Sep 2028)
Source & method
The most the customer may buy at the Tier 1 rate in each year of the rate period, set in BPA's RHWM process; a cap on eligibility, not a delivery or a purchase
FY2026–FY2028 rate period (Oct 2025–Sep 2028) · reported · direct · valid · final
snopud-rhwm-fy2026-2028; Final 2026 RHWM outputs; RHWM!S108
Provider of Choice Contract High Water Mark, final as published 2026-05-28
792.618MWa
Oct 2028–Sep 2044
Source & method
BPA's one-time FY 2026 calculation from FY 2023 PF-eligible load and a base allowance of the 2024 RHWM, with its headroom, conservation, new-resource, load-growth and proportional-share adjustments (Calculation!I2:N2): the maximum the customer may buy at the Tier 1 rate over the Provider of Choice contract period, not a current delivery right
Oct 2028–Sep 2044 · reported · direct · valid · final
Final: BPA declined the one dispute filed (another customer's) on 2026-05-28 and will not revisit the FY 2026 calculation, though CHWMs may be adjusted in later rate periods under the contracts (CHWM Implementation Policy, 2025-08-14, pages 2-3). The contract period is the one the utility's audited Note 8 states (October 2028 through September 2044)
snopud-chwm-poc-final; Provider of Choice FY 2026 CHWM Calculation, final CHWMs; Calculation!O111
BPA’s forecast by fiscal year Net requirementA BPA customer's load less new large single loads and the resources it dedicates to its load: the power BPA sells it under section 5(b) of the Northwest Power Act. BPA forecasts it in each RHWM process; a forecast is not a measurement.Definition ↗, forecast in the RHWM process; BPA’s fiscal year runs October to September
ModeledEach figure in its own unit, as BPA’s workbook states it; BPA’s forecast, not a measurement. A fiscal year’s figures are never added to the next.
Fiscal year
Load net of resourcesforecast
Load above the RHWMforecast
FY2026 (Oct 2025–Sep 2026)
771.797 MWa
0 MWa
FY2027 (Oct 2026–Sep 2027)
781.453 MWa
0 MWa
FY2028 (Oct 2027–Sep 2028)
788.591 MWa
0 MWa
Not published: BPA's annual Load Following net-requirement data for this customer, FY2027 (Oct 2026–Sep 2027). The file holds measured FY2024 and FY2025 loads for the customers Section 17 of the Load Following CHWM contracts covers, and no forecast; BES id 10354 is not in its customer column, since Snohomish bought Slice/Block in those years. The last published forecast is the RHWM process's. Held by Bonneville Power Administration. Load Following net requirements data (2026-07-31) ↗
Contract Demand QuantitiesA demand amount in kilowatts written into a BPA Regional Dialogue contract, one for each month of the year; BPA publishes the list with an effective date. Not a measured peak and not energy, and twelve months are never added.Definition ↗ effective 2026-05-01
One amount per month of the contract year, in kilowatts, as BPA’s sheet states it. A demand amount, not a measured peak or energy; the twelve are never added.
October
November
December
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
171,238 kW
240,477 kW
144,291 kW
168,420 kW
155,813 kW
150,099 kW
123,020 kW
67,483 kW
16,582 kW
50,635 kW
19,630 kW
60,595 kW
What the utility reports paying BPA
Power purchased from BPA
239,000,000USD
2024 calendar year
Source & method
What the utility reports it paid BPA for power in the calendar year, rounded to the million in its unaudited discussion; the audited statements carry purchased power only in total
2024 calendar year · reported · curated · valid · final
The report states BPA's share of its energy only as approximately 80% (2025) and 75% (2024) of energy purchases (Note 8) and publishes no BPA megawatt-hours for either year, so no price per MWh is derived
snopud-bpa-purchases-2024; Snohomish County PUD 2025 Annual Report; Management's Discussion and Analysis (unaudited), BPA Rates, page 21 (PDF page 25)
What the utility reports it paid BPA for power in the calendar year, rounded to the million in its unaudited discussion; the audited statements carry purchased power only in total
2025 calendar year · reported · curated · valid · final
The report states BPA's share of its energy only as approximately 80% (2025) and 75% (2024) of energy purchases (Note 8) and publishes no BPA megawatt-hours for either year, so no price per MWh is derived; Spans the product change: Slice/Block until Sep 2025, Load Following Oct 2025–Sep 2028
snopud-bpa-purchases-2025; Snohomish County PUD 2025 Annual Report; Management's Discussion and Analysis (unaudited), BPA Rates, page 21 (PDF page 25)
CY2025 spans the product change: Slice/Block until Sep 2025, Load Following Oct 2025–Sep 2028.
“Power purchases from BPA were $235 million in 2025 and $239 million in 2024, respectively” — Snohomish County PUD 2025 Annual Report ↗, Management's Discussion and Analysis (unaudited), BPA Rates, page 21 (PDF page 25).
No price per MWh: no document here gives the utility's BPA energy for the same period as its BPA dollars.
What FERC’s records hold read 2026-09-29
Where FERC's public records stop for this account, as read on the date given, each line citing what was read. Statements only: no FERC figure enters the account.
FERC Form 1Neither Snohomish County PUD nor BPA files FERC Form 1: no respondent in PUDL's Form 1 utility table is named Snohomish, Seattle or Bonneville. Form 1 records a purchase from BPA only on a respondent's own purchased-power schedule, so it holds none of this utility's.Source ↗ core_pudl__assn_ferc1_pudl_utilities, PUDL v2026.9.0 (438 respondents, latest report year 2025).
Electric Quarterly Report: BPA's filingBPA files the Electric Quarterly Report as seller C002357. In PUDL's extract, none of BPA's contract rows in the eight quarters read (2015q4, 2018q4, 2021q4, 2023q4, 2024q4, 2025q3, 2025q4, 2026q2) is a Regional Dialogue or Priority Firm power sale, and every transaction BPA reports to Snohomish County PUD from 2013q3 to 2026q2 is a short-term market sale under its market-based agreement DE-MS79-91BP93445. No document read says BPA files its Regional Dialogue sales under the exclusion below, and its filings are consistent with it. The utility's reports do not say whether those market purchases sit in its BPA figure.18 CFR 35.10b(c)(2), excluded from the Electric Quarterly Report (eCFR, current to 2026-09-25): “Sales by a non-public utility under a long-term, cost-based agreement required to be made to certain customers under Federal or state statute” Rule text ↗Source ↗ core_ferceqr__contracts and core_ferceqr__transactions, seller C002357; PUDL EQR package 2026.8.1.dev56 (Last-Modified 2026-09-02). PUDL drops about 0.6% of EQR records for CSV quoting errors, so each absence is an absence in PUDL's extract, not necessarily in FERC's filings (known issue ↗).
Electric Quarterly Report: the utility's ownSnohomish County PUD files no Electric Quarterly Report: FERC's company identifier listing has no row naming it, and no filer in PUDL's extract is named Snohomish.Source ↗ August 2025 CID listing, organizations with no inactive date and an assigned region: no row naming Snohomish; PUDL core_ferceqr__quarterly_identity for 2015q4, 2018q4, 2023q4, 2025q4 and 2026q2.
On the residential bill Schedule 7 · Residential Service, effective 2026-04-01, in the utility’s own words
Where BPA's costs and benefits reach this utility's residential bill, in the utility's own documents: each clause that carries them into the sheet's charges, cited to the document that sets it, a price only where the utility prints one, and what no document states. The account's BPA dollars are never divided by revenue or sales to make a share of a bill.
BPA Cost Adjustment“From time to time the Bonneville Power Administration (“BPA”) adjusts its wholesale power and transmission rate to the PUD. At the discretion of the Commission, the rates in this Schedule may be adjusted to reflect BPA rate adjustments, either up or down, on the same date the BPA rate changes become effective. The adjusted rate will be developed by incorporating the BPA cost change into the Electric Cost of Service Model and rate design policies adopted by the Commission in the most recent rate proceeding.” No line or price of its own: an adjustment changes the schedule's Base Charge (USD per day) and Energy Charge (USD per kWh), and the sheet does not say what part of either reflects BPA's rates. Discretionary: the rates 'may be adjusted'. Schedule 7 sheet ↗ Schedule 7 section (6) BPA COST ADJUSTMENT; Rate Schedule 7 page 2, PDF p. 3, read 2026-09-28.
No price
BPA Residential Exchange Credit“BPA is authorized to offer Residential Exchange benefits to eligible utilities, which benefits must be passed through to the utility’s residential and small farm customers. To the extent the PUD obtains Residential Exchange benefits in any given BPA rate period, the rates in this Schedule will be adjusted by applying credits that reflect the benefits the PUD receives.” The sheet names the credit and prints no amount; the utility's rates page prints it and gives no effective date. Not added to the computed bills, which take only prices printed on the sheet. Schedule 7 sheet ↗ Schedule 7 section (7) BPA RESIDENTIAL EXCHANGE BENEFITS; Rate Schedule 7 page 2, PDF p. 3, read 2026-09-28. Price as printed: “Your billing rate is discounted by the BPA Residential Exchange Credit of $.000318 per kilowatt-hour.” (source ↗, Electric rates, Residential rates, the sentence below the link to the electric rate book).
-0.000318 USD/kWh
Where each dollar the utility collects goes“42¢ Power Purchases, PUD Hydropower Projects & Transmission” Purchases from every supplier, the utility's own hydro projects and transmission together, averaged over all rate classes, with no period stated: not BPA alone and not the residential class. Source ↗ Electric rates, graphic below 'Every dollar the PUD collects supports key programs, services and reliability efforts to deliver power to customers' (Dollar2026.png), first of five segments, captioned 'Average across all rate classes', read 2026-09-28.
Quoted
Share of a residential bill that pays for BPA power Not stated in any document read: the rate book, the utility's electric rates page, its 2025 Annual Report and its announcement of the 2026 rates (2025-12-08). The annual report's BPA dollars (USD 235 million in 2025) are all of its BPA purchases, not a residential class's, so no share of a residential bill is derived from them. Schedule 7 sheet ↗ Schedule 7 sections (3) RATE, (6) and (7); PDF pp. 2-3, read 2026-09-28.
Beside it, not reconciled disclosure attributionA supplier’s reported sources of electricity sold to Washington customers, grouped by fuel.Definition ↗, not energy BPA delivered
Washington retail sales Commerce attributes to BPA, CY2024
6,040,522MWh
2024 calendar year
Source & method
Commerce's disclosure attribution of the utility's Washington retail sales to the BPA system mix, summed over fuel categories; not energy BPA delivered and not reconciled with BPA's figures or the utility's dollars
2024 calendar year · reported · derived · valid · final
snopud-fmd-bpa-2024; Fuel Mix Disclosure CY2024, Utility Fuel Mix by Fuel Category extract (sheet Report Extract, run 2025-12-10); claimant_id=97
Of 6,950,952 MWh all disclosed Washington retail sales, CY2024. Commerce's disclosure attribution of the utility's Washington retail sales to the BPA system mix, summed over fuel categories; not energy BPA delivered and not reconciled with BPA's figures or the utility's dollars.
An entitlement is not a delivery and neither is a payment: an RHWM or CHWM in MWa caps what may be bought at the Tier 1 rate, a CDQ in kW is a monthly demand amount, a net requirement is load less resources, and dollars are what the utility reports it paid. None is added to, subtracted from or divided by another.
BPA's fiscal year runs October to September, a rate period is several fiscal years, the utility reports calendar years, and the Provider of Choice CHWM governs a contract period that has not begun. Figures of different periods are shown with their periods and never compared as if they covered the same time.
The product changed on the dates in the history: a figure names the products in force during its period, and one that spans a change says so.
Where the utility's note splits a year's BPA row into Block and Slice rows, each is a component of that year's purchase, not a product bought on its own: shown beneath the year's row, never added to it and never priced per MWh.
Credits from BPA (refunds, true-ups, reserve distributions) are quoted on the years the utility ties them to its BPA cost. None is netted, added or allocated, so a year's price per MWh is the utility's expense over its energy, including whatever it netted, and not a rate BPA charged.
The Fuel Mix Disclosure's BPA megawatt-hours are Commerce's attribution of the utility's Washington retail sales to BPA's system mix. They sit beside these figures and are not delivered energy, and they are not reconciled with BPA's quantities or the utility's dollars.
A price per MWh is derived only where the utility publishes its BPA energy in MWh for the same period in the same document as the dollars. An average in MWa is shown as printed and never multiplied by hours into MWh.
No cost is modeled from BPA's rate schedules: rates times these quantities would be an estimate, not a published figure.
Full serviceA utility that sells electricity to customers. Full-service sales include both electricity and delivery.Definition ↗
Average revenue per kWhRevenue divided by electricity sold. This average is not a tariff or a household bill.Definition ↗ is realized revenue ÷ sales, not a tariff.
WA · commercial
Retail sales
2,431,764MWh
2024
Source & method
EIA-861 electricity sold to ultimate customers for the stated utility, state, customer class and service type; calendar year
2024 calendar year · reported · direct · valid · final
Sold to retail customers in the stated state (utility x state grain); bundled full-service rows only in the summaries; energy-only and delivery-only rows are listed but never added to bundled sales. Realized average revenue per kWh is not a tariff.
Clean-energy obligationsFive separate records of a clean-energy obligation, never merged: applicability (which statute reaches this utility and why), target (the figure as enacted or ordered, or as a filing or compilation restates it, with that standing marked), filed achievement (what the utility itself reported for a period), determination (what the issuing body decided about the filing, with its order number and date) and deciding event (the open proceeding, its next step and where to comment). A fuel-mix value is none of these, and a filing that restates a target does not enact it.Definition ↗
checked 2026-09-27
Five kinds kept apart: what applies, what is owed, what the utility filed, what the issuing body decided, and the open proceeding. The disclosed-supply block above is the same utility's fuel mix as Commerce computed it; read it beside these rows, never as a verdict on them. Rows checked through 2026-09-27; a row past its review date is marked, not removed.
Clean Energy Transformation Act RCW 19.405 ↗ · Washington State Department of Commerce (plan adopted by the utility's governing board)
Applicability not yet curated for this utility.
Clean energy implementation plan every four years (RCW 19.405.060) with interim targets; coal out of the allocation by 2025-12-31, greenhouse gas neutral retail sales from 2030-01-01, 100 percent renewable or nonemitting by 2045-01-01
What is owed The obligation as enacted or ordered; a utility’s own restatement does not enact it.
interim target for the 2022-2025 compliance periodcompiled Washington State Department of Commerce · CEIP Draft Aggregate Workbook 22.12.15.xlsx, sheet Interim targets· of retail electric load As the document puts itSplit over the period: renewable 87 percent, nonemitting 13 percent. Utility Number in the Commerce workbook is the EIA utility identifier.
eliminate coal-fired resources from the utility's allocation of electricityenacted Washington State Legislature · RCW 19.405.030 Coal-fired resources - Depreciation schedule - Penalties· of the utility's allocation of electricity supplied by coal-fired resources As the document puts itOn or before December 31, 2025. Excludes decommissioning and remediation costs; long-term BPA purchases are exempt unless the electricity is known to be coal-fired. The commission must set depreciation schedules ending no later than 2025-12-31.
greenhouse gas neutral retail sales, at least 80 percent from renewable and nonemitting resourcesenacted Washington State Legislature · RCW 19.405.040 Greenhouse gas neutral electricity supply· of retail sales of electricity to Washington retail electric customers As the document puts itBy January 1, 2030. Up to 20 percent of the obligation may be met by alternative compliance: alternative compliance payments, unbundled renewable energy credits or energy transformation projects. Four-year compliance periods 2030-2033, 2034-2037, 2038-2041 and 2042-2044.
nonemitting generation and renewable resources supply 100 percent of retail salesenacted Washington State Legislature · RCW 19.405.050 One hundred percent renewable and nonemitting electricity supply· of retail sales of electricity to Washington retail electric customers As the document puts itBy January 1, 2045, with an annual demonstration of compliance after that date.
What the utility filed Its own report of what it did; a number it reports, not a verdict.
Not yet curated As the document puts itThe atlas has not curated an assertion of this kind for this utility; this is the atlas's coverage, not the utility's record, and it is not a finding of compliance or of its absence The atlas has not curated this kind for this utility; that is the atlas’s coverage, not the utility’s record.
What the issuing body decided Orders and acknowledgments on the filings.
Not yet curated As the document puts itThe atlas has not curated an assertion of this kind for this utility; this is the atlas's coverage, not the utility's record, and it is not a finding of compliance or of its absence The atlas has not curated this kind for this utility; that is the atlas’s coverage, not the utility’s record.
The open proceeding Where the next decision is being made, and how to take part.
Not yet curated As the document puts itThe atlas has not curated an assertion of this kind for this utility; this is the atlas's coverage, not the utility's record, and it is not a finding of compliance or of its absence The atlas has not curated this kind for this utility; that is the atlas’s coverage, not the utility’s record.
What stays uncertain in these sources
No documented JSON API; the `apiproxy` host answered HTTP 500.30 all session and detail pages said "Record not found".The document endpoint served every filing read on 2026-09-19 and 2026-09-21; it remains undocumented.
resolved
Docket files before 2024 are not available. We are working to resolve the issue.
open
The collection of 2026-2029 CEIPs … are still ongoing.
open
Energy Independence Act (Initiative 937) RCW 19.285 ↗ · the utility's governing board, examined by the Washington State Auditor
Applicability not yet curated for this utility.
Biennial conservation acquisition target and an annual eligible-renewable target (15 percent of load from 2020) for utilities serving more than 25,000 Washington customers
What is owed The obligation as enacted or ordered; a utility’s own restatement does not enact it.
eligible renewable resources or renewable energy credits, or a combination, equal to at least 15 percent of load each year from 2020enacted Washington State Legislature · RCW 19.285.040 Energy conservation and renewable energy targets · (2)(a)(iii)· of the qualifying utility's load As the document puts it"At least 15 percent of its load by January 1, 2020, and each year thereafter" (2)(a)(iii), after 3 percent (2012-2015) and 9 percent (2016-2019). Initiative 937, approved 2006-11-07 (2007 c 1). Subsection (2) also provides alternative compliance paths (accelerated conservation and demand response; the four percent incremental-cost cap), so a utility can comply below 15 percent, as Clark Public Utilities does.
biennial conservation acquisition target for 2024-2025compiled Washington State Department of Commerce · EIA 2026 Report Summary and Detail.xlsx, sheet Conservation by Utility · cell B19 As the document puts itBiennium 2024-2025. Prior biennium 2022-2023 target 69204 MWh; change from the 2022-2023 target 0.334177.
renewable energy target for 2026compiled Washington State Department of Commerce · EIA 2026 Report Summary and Detail.xlsx, sheet Renewable by Utility· of average load 2024-2025 As the document puts itAverage load 2024-2025 6837995.5 MWh.
What the utility filed Its own report of what it did; a number it reports, not a verdict.
conservation acquired in 2024compiled Washington State Department of Commerce · EIA 2026 Report Summary and Detail.xlsx, sheet Conservation by Utility · cell C19 As the document puts itCounts toward the 2024-2025 biennial target.
2024-2025 conservation acquired as a share of retail load, as Commerce computed itcompiled Washington State Department of Commerce · EIA 2026 Report Summary and Detail.xlsx, sheet Conservation by Utility · cell G19· of retail load over the biennial period's two load years (Commerce's sheet Select Data) As the document puts itCommerce's column G formula, (2024 acquired + 2025 acquired) / the biennial period's two load years on sheet Select Data (columns C and D); the cell's value, not recomputed. Commerce formats it as a percent to one decimal.
total conservation savings as a share of the 2024-2025 target, as Commerce computed itcompiled Washington State Department of Commerce · EIA 2026 Report Summary and Detail.xlsx, sheet Conservation by Utility · cell F19· of the 2024-2025 conservation target in Commerce's column B As the document puts itCommerce's column F formula, (2024 acquired + 2025 acquired + excess from the prior two bienniums) / 2024-2025 target; the cell's value, not recomputed. Commerce formats it as a whole percent.
excess conservation carried from the prior two bienniums toward the 2024-2025 targetcompiled Washington State Department of Commerce · EIA 2026 Report Summary and Detail.xlsx, sheet Conservation by Utility · cell E19 As the document puts itCommerce's column E.
conservation acquired in 2025compiled Washington State Department of Commerce · EIA 2026 Report Summary and Detail.xlsx, sheet Conservation by Utility · cell D19 As the document puts itCounts toward the 2024-2025 biennial target.
qualifying renewable resources acquired for 2026compiled Washington State Department of Commerce · EIA 2026 Report Summary and Detail.xlsx, sheet Renewable by Utility As the document puts itEqual to 0.155743 of average load 2024-2025; 2025 qualifying renewables were 1020817 MWh. Incremental cost of eligible renewables as a share of revenue requirement 0.
What the issuing body decided Orders and acknowledgments on the filings.
Not yet curated As the document puts itThe atlas has not curated an assertion of this kind for this utility; this is the atlas's coverage, not the utility's record, and it is not a finding of compliance or of its absence The atlas has not curated this kind for this utility; that is the atlas’s coverage, not the utility’s record.
The open proceeding Where the next decision is being made, and how to take part.
Not yet curated As the document puts itThe atlas has not curated an assertion of this kind for this utility; this is the atlas's coverage, not the utility's record, and it is not a finding of compliance or of its absence The atlas has not curated this kind for this utility; that is the atlas’s coverage, not the utility’s record.
What stays uncertain in these sources
SAO says it examines "13 qualifying utilities" for EIA and "39 qualifying utilities" for CETA — the count difference (18 vs 13) is unexplained; cooperatives are audited independently.
open
After June 12, 2026, utilities will shift from annual reporting on EIA compliance progress to biennial reporting.
open
PDFs; findings are the legal compliance determinations for COUs.
Compiled by Commerce, not a compliance determination
RCW 19.285.040(1) ↗ · Washington State Department of Commerce, EIA 2026 Report Summary and Detail.xlsx, sheet Conservation by Utility · utility reports submitted 2026-06-01 · checked 2026-09-27
Commerce's 2026 Energy Independence Act report summary, from the utilities' reports submitted 2026-06-01. Every value is Commerce's cell; the two percent columns are Commerce's own formulas, shown in Commerce's format and never recomputed. Rows are alphabetical and nothing is ranked. Whether a utility complied is decided by the commission for an investor-owned utility and examined by the State Auditor for a consumer-owned one.
Biennium 2024-2025. Each value is the publisher’s cell at the row and column given; this utility’s row is marked.
Utilitysheet row
TargetMWh · column B
Acquired in 2024MWh · column C
Acquired in 2025MWh · column D
Excess carried from the prior two bienniumsMWh · column E
Total savings, percent of the targetpercent, the publisher’s formula · column F
Acquired, percent of retail loadpercent, the publisher’s formula · column G
Consumer-owned utilities, each against its own targetEach sets its biennial target by action of its governing board (WAC 194-37-070(2) and (4)). A percent compares a utility with its own target, not with another utility's.
Investor-owned utilities, listed apartThe commission accepts these targets (WAC 480-109-120), and Commerce's target column does not use one basis for the three: each row says which figure Commerce printed, beside the commission's order.
Avista ↗row 3 Target column: Avista's total conservation goal: the commission's 63,374 MWh EIA target plus the 3,169 MWh decoupling penalty threshold (UE-230897 Order 01) 2024-2025 biennial conservation acquisition target accepted by the commission: 63,374 MWh · UE-230897 Order ↗2024-2025 EIA penalty threshold accepted by the commission: 47,635 MWh · UE-230897 Order ↗
66,543 MWh
51,580 MWh
45,279 MWh
0 MWh
146%
0.8%
PacifiCorp ↗row 15 Target column: the commission's 2024-2025 EIA target itself (UE-230904 Order 01); its penalty threshold is 74,839 MWh 2024-2025 biennial conservation acquisition target accepted by the commission: 84,971 MWh · UE-230904 Order ↗2024-2025 EIA penalty threshold accepted by the commission: 74,839 MWh · UE-230904 Order ↗
84,971 MWh
40,269 MWh
53,920 MWh
0 MWh
111%
1.2%
Puget Sound Energy ↗row 17 Target column: the commission's 2024-2025 EIA penalty threshold (UE-230892 Order 01), not its 304,400 MWh EIA target 2024-2025 biennial conservation acquisition target accepted by the commission: 304,400 MWh · UE-230892 Order ↗2024-2025 EIA penalty threshold accepted by the commission: 268,702 MWh · UE-230892 Order ↗
268,702 MWh
280,964 MWh
293,527 MWh
0 MWh
214%
1.4%
Totalrow 21 · Commerce's own line: its sum of all eighteen rows, the three investor-owned figures on their differing bases included. As printed, never recomputed.
SAIDISystem Average Interruption Duration Index: the minutes of sustained interruption the average customer had over the year, customer-minutes interrupted divided by customers served. Each utility calculates and reports its own figure on EIA-861 Schedule 3, under the method it declares. A system average says nothing about one address.Definition ↗, SAIFISystem Average Interruption Frequency Index: how many sustained interruptions the average customer had over the year, customers interrupted divided by customers served, as the utility reports it on EIA-861 Schedule 3.Definition ↗ and CAIDICustomer Average Interruption Duration Index: minutes per sustained interruption, SAIDI divided by SAIFI on the same basis. EIA-861 asks utilities for SAIDI and SAIFI only; EIA publishes CAIDI with the data and the atlas shows it as published, never recomputed.Definition ↗ count sustained interruptions. Figures with and without major event daysDays a utility sets apart from normal operation: EIA describes them as events such as snowstorms, floods or heatwaves, or periods of outages that differ greatly from the utility's own five-year history. EIA-861 asks for the indices both with and without them. Part B respondents determine them under IEEE 1366; Part C respondents define a major event themselves. The two series answer different questions and are never blended.Definition ↗ are different measures; compare like with like.
WA · IEEE 1366EIA-861 Schedule 3 has two parts. Part B is for utilities that calculate SAIDI and SAIFI and determine major event days under IEEE 1366-2003 or IEEE 1366-2012; Part C is for any other method, where the utility also states how it defines a momentary interruption and whether inactive accounts count as customers. Figures from the two parts are not comparable and the atlas never pools them; utilities under Part C do not share one method either.Definition ↗
Index
Major event days included
Major event days excluded
Included, loss of supply removed
SAIDIminutes/customer/year
620.9
181.4
439.5
SAIFIinterruptions/customer/year
2.48
1.56
0.92
CAIDIminutes/interruption
250.4
116.3
477.7
Customers the indices are based on
386,741 customers
Highest voltage counted as distribution
12.5 kV
How it was measuredDetermined under IEEE 1366-2003 or IEEE 1366-2012; the form does not record which edition
Outages recorded automatically: yes
Others reporting the same way · major event days included21 utilities in WA under IEEE 1366. Each counts once whatever its size; this is context, not a ranking.
SAIDI median 258.5 (52.9–1,887) minutes/customer/yearSAIFI median 1.41 interruptions/customer/year
Others reporting the same way · major event days excluded21 utilities in WA under IEEE 1366. Each counts once whatever its size; this is context, not a ranking.
SAIDI median 136.1 (39.5–604.7) minutes/customer/yearSAIFI median 1 interruptions/customer/year
Every year filed
As filed each year. SAIDI in minutes per customer per year; SAIFI in interruptions per customer per year. Blank cells were not reported.
Year
State
Standard
SAIDI with
SAIDI without
SAIFI with
SAIFI without
Customers
2024
WA
IEEE 1366
620.9
181.4
2.48
1.56
386,741
2023
WA
IEEE 1366
120.2
111.9
1.18
1.1
382,404
2022
WA
IEEE 1366
1,004.1
137.7
2.32
1.14
378,339
2021
WA
IEEE 1366
642.9
137.9
2.24
1.29
373,559
2020
WA
IEEE 1366
255.5
131.8
1.69
1.25
368,222
2019
WA
IEEE 1366
124.9
91.3
1
0.86
361,319
2018
WA
Other method
270.8
92.8
1.65
0.91
358,110
2017
WA
Other method
167.8
123.9
1.6
1.34
353,550
2016
WA
Other method
136.6
59.6
1.1
0.62
368,229
2015
WA
Other method
1,373.6
81
2.6
0.85
359,854
2014
WA
Other method
119
119
1.17
1.17
354,519
2013
WA
Other method
85
60
0.83
0.6
354,090
Reported by the utility on EIA-861 Schedule 3 under the method it declares. IEEE 1366 and other-method figures are not comparable, and values with and without major event days answer different questions. A system average says nothing about one address. CAIDI is published by EIA as SAIDI divided by SAIFI; it is not a line on the form. A value the utility left blank stays blank. Source and licence· Frozen facts for this utility ↗
Customer programmes
EIA-861 Schedule 6, as filed
Programme results as each utility filed them, by customer class and report year, each in its own unit. Classes are never added into a total, years are never added into a period, and savings are never divided by sales. The one ratio shown, enrolled demand-response customers against the utility's own EIA-861 customer count for the same state, class and year, carries both counts.
Energy efficiency EIA-861 Schedule 6 Part A
Reported by the utility on EIA-861 Schedule 6 Part A as adjusted gross savings at the customer meter under its own evaluation; figures are not comparable across utilities. Reporting-year incremental savings are annualized for participants new that year; life-cycle savings run over the programmes' planned life (energy as a lump sum, peak as the average annual reduction). Each class is shown as filed and the total row is the filer's own; nothing is summed here. Costs are nominal dollars of the report year (the form collects thousands; PUDL publishes dollars). A blank stays blank.
Report year 2024, WA. Each row is one customer class as filed; the filer's total is its own line and is not the sum of the rows above. Costs are nominal dollars.
Class
Incremental annual energy savings, reporting year (annualized)MWh
Customer incentives, incremental life-cycle cost (nominal)USD · life cycle
Other costs, incremental life-cycle (nominal)USD · life cycle
Other costs, reporting-year incremental (nominal)USD
CommercialBPAT
24,110 MWh
5.5 MW
319,715 MWh
3.2 MW
13.3 years
$8,477,931
$8,477,931
$3,260,359
$3,260,359
IndustrialBPAT
16,839 MWh
3.8 MW
209,835 MWh
2.2 MW
12.5 years
$5,938,681
$5,938,681
$2,283,839
$2,283,839
ResidentialBPAT
10,493 MWh
2.4 MW
135,978 MWh
1.4 MW
13 years
$1,171,251
$1,171,251
$450,428
$450,428
TransportationBPAT
0 MWh
0 MW
0 MWh
0 MW
0 years
$0
$0
$0
$0
Filer's totalBPAT
51,441 MWh
11.7 MW
665,528 MWh
6.9 MW
not applicable
$15,587,863
$15,587,863
$5,994,626
$5,994,626
Demand response EIA-861 Schedule 6 Part B
Reported by the utility on EIA-861 Schedule 6 Part B. Potential peak savings assume every programme is called; actual peak savings are what was achieved at the company's own annual peak hour, and the two are never merged. Customers are enrolled customers, a count. Costs are nominal dollars of the report year. The form has no total row and none is computed here. A blank stays blank.
Report year 2023, WA. Each row is one customer class as filed; the form has no total row and none is computed. Costs are nominal dollars.
Class
Customers enrolled in demand response programmescount
Energy savings from demand responseMWh
Potential peak demand savings, all demand response calledMW · potential
Actual peak demand savings at the annual system peak hourMW · achieved
Customer incentives (nominal)USD
Other programme costs (nominal)USD
Enrolled share of this class's customersderived
CommercialBPAT
not reported
not reported
not reported
not reported
not reported
not reported
no denominator for this year
IndustrialBPAT
not reported
not reported
not reported
not reported
not reported
not reported
no denominator for this year
ResidentialBPAT
226
0 MWh
0.2 MW
0.1 MW
$4,027
$53,925
no denominator for this year
TransportationBPAT
not reported
not reported
not reported
not reported
not reported
not reported
no denominator for this year
Population: organizations of this release with EIA-861 rows in the core states. A short-form respondent has no figures to file; a long-form respondent without a row may have no programmes or may have a nonutility administrator reporting for it. Years without a row are listed against the table's span, not against the years this utility filed the form.
What the sheet says
TariffA utility’s published rates and charges, with an effective date.Definition ↗ · not a bill
Schedule 7· WA· effective 2026-04-01
Basic chargeper day, small service; medium 0.80, large 1.14, extra-large 1.86 by panel size (effective 2025-04-01)
$0.49
EnergyResidential Service· Elected commission (Resolution 6260)
0.10613 USD/kWh, all kWh (0.10263 from 2024-04-01)
Adjustment schedules named on the sheetlisted, never added in
BPA cost adjustment clause; Residential Exchange Program credit pass-through
Adopted by the elected commission, not a regulator; the OpenEI entry is the 2025 sheet and is superseded by this one.Source sheet ↗read 2026-09-18· OpenEI entry ↗ dated 2025-04-01, a discovery index only
ModeledComputed billsA declared usage case priced on a published tariff sheet: kWh in one bill, the days it covers, and where the sheet has them a service size, dwelling type or jurisdiction and a season. The total is the schedule's own charges: the fixed charge plus the energy charge by tier. Where the same sheet prints prices for named adjustments or credits, a second, separately labelled total adds them; those prices change on their own schedules. Whatever the sheet only names, such as a city tax, is listed and never added, so neither total is a complete bill. It is an illustration, not a billing record, and it is not the realized average revenue per kWh that EIA-861 reports.Definition ↗ for 3 declared cases · Medium Service. Prices are the sheet’s own; usage and days are assumptions.
Case
Schedule charges (USD)
With adjustments the sheet prices (USD)
Next kWh costs (USD/kWh)
Average (cents/kWh)
600 kWh over 30 days
$87.68
None priced on this sheet
$0.10613
14.61schedule charges ÷ kWh
900 kWh over 30 days
$119.52
None priced on this sheet
$0.10613
13.28schedule charges ÷ kWh
1,200 kWh over 30 days
$151.36
None priced on this sheet
$0.10613
12.61schedule charges ÷ kWh
How each total adds up
600 kWh over 30 days
Line
Quantity
Price
Amount (USD)
Base Charge
30 day
$0.8000 per day
$24.00
Energy Charge
600 kWh
$0.10613 per kWh
$63.68
Schedule charges
$87.68
900 kWh over 30 days
Line
Quantity
Price
Amount (USD)
Base Charge
30 day
$0.8000 per day
$24.00
Energy Charge
900 kWh
$0.10613 per kWh
$95.52
Schedule charges
$119.52
1,200 kWh over 30 days
Line
Quantity
Price
Amount (USD)
Base Charge
30 day
$0.8000 per day
$24.00
Energy Charge
1,200 kWh
$0.10613 per kWh
$127.36
Schedule charges
$151.36
Named on the sheet without a price, so in neither total: Tax Additions; BPA Cost Adjustment; BPA Residential Exchange Benefits. This sheet prices no adjustment, so there is no second total.
Schedule 200· Net Metering Program· effective 2009-04-01
Excess kilowatt-hours are credited to future bills at the same price the customer pays for energy; any credit remaining on 31 March is zeroed with no payment. The programme year runs 1 April to 31 March and systems are capped at 100 kW AC
Printed in the same rate book as Schedule 7; meter aggregation is allowed on the customer's own premises.Source ↗read 2026-09-18
The price on the utility's own sheet on the date it was read, with the adjustment schedules it names listed beside it and never added in. It is not a bill, and it is not the realized average revenue per kWh that EIA-861 reports above: the two answer different questions.
Distributed generationCustomer-sited and small generation reported by utilities in aggregate on EIA-861; no locations; a separate population from the plant inventory, never added to it.Definition ↗
Utility reports · no locations
Distributed generation reported by this utility to EIA-861 for 2024, by state
Utility-reported, no locations, not in the EIA-860 plant inventory (>= 1 MW). Storage is listed separately and never added to generation capacity. Non-net-metered units >= 1 MW can also appear in EIA-860; the overlap is disclosed, not resolved. Source rollup rows are excluded from every sum.
Sum of EIA-861 utility-reported nameplate capacity over leaf technology classes, excluding storage and source rollup rows; utility x state grain; no locations; not part of the EIA-860 plant inventory
2024 calendar year · reported · derived · valid · final
1 of 1 reporting utilities included.
net-metered + non-net-metered; the two EIA-861 schedules are disjoint by design
Customer counts can include the same customer under more than one technology. Energy sold to utilities measures exports; it does not measure all generation at customer sites.
Net-metered customers
4,947count
2024
Source & method
EIA-861 net metering customer count over leaf technology classes; a customer with two technologies can be counted twice by the source
2024 calendar year · reported · derived · valid · final
Washington State Legislature (RCW 19.405, RCW 19.285), Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission orders and docket filings, Washington State Department of Commerce EIA and CEIP report summaries, and each utility's own filings, cited per row
One assertion per row, five kinds kept apart: what applies, what is owed, what the utility filed, what the issuing body decided, and the open proceeding. A fuel-mix value is not a compliance verdict, and a filing that restates a target does not enact it; standing on each row says whose figure it is. An absent row states what was checked and when; a utility not in the file has not been curated.
BPA supply accounts (pipeline/config/crosswalks/bpa_customer.csv and supply_accounts.csv)
Bonneville Power Administration (RHWM outputs, Provider of Choice CHWM calculation, CDQs, customer products lists, product change letter), Snohomish County PUD (2025 Annual Report; Electric Utility Rates, Schedule 7; electric rates page) and Seattle City Light (financial statements for 2016, 2018, 2022, 2024 and 2025; 2021A and 2026A official statements; residential rates page) with the City of Seattle's rate ordinances, cited per row; FERC coverage lines cite PUDL's FERC Form 1 and EQR extracts (CC-BY-4.0), the eCFR and FERC's CID listing
Entitlements (MWa), demand quantities (kW), forecasts net of resources (MWa), dollars (USD), energy received (MWh, or MWa as an average) and a disclosure attribution (MWh), each with its own period and document, never added, subtracted or divided across one another. A figure names the BPA product in force during its period; a price per MWh appears only where the utility publishes the same period's BPA energy in MWh in the same document, badged derived. A note's Block and Slice rows are components of the year's purchase, never products, never added to its total and never priced. The bill trace quotes the utility's residential sheet and prints a price only where the utility does, in its unit; the share of a bill that pays for BPA power is shown only where a document states it.
Display names and aliases (pipeline/config/crosswalks/aliases.csv)
Display names verified against each organization's own website; EIA legal names retained as aliases
A display name is the name an organization uses for itself; the EIA name stays searchable and on the record. Each row cites the page that shows the name.
Catalyst Cooperative, PUDL v2026.9.0, derived from U.S. EIA Forms 860/923
Data transformed by PUDL from U.S. EIA forms; selected fields republished; EIA data is public with dated acknowledgment (https://www.eia.gov/about/copyrights_reuse.php)
Catalyst Cooperative, PUDL v2026.9.0, derived from U.S. EIA Forms 860/923
Data transformed by PUDL from U.S. EIA forms; selected fields republished; EIA data is public with dated acknowledgment (https://www.eia.gov/about/copyrights_reuse.php)
Catalyst Cooperative, PUDL v2026.9.0, derived from U.S. EIA Form 861
Data transformed by PUDL from U.S. EIA forms; selected fields republished; EIA data is public with dated acknowledgment (https://www.eia.gov/about/copyrights_reuse.php)
Catalyst Cooperative, PUDL v2026.9.0, derived from U.S. EIA Form 861
Data transformed by PUDL from U.S. EIA forms; selected fields republished; EIA data is public with dated acknowledgment (https://www.eia.gov/about/copyrights_reuse.php)
Catalyst Cooperative, PUDL v2026.9.0, derived from U.S. EIA Form 861
Data transformed by PUDL from U.S. EIA forms; selected fields republished; EIA data is public with dated acknowledgment (https://www.eia.gov/about/copyrights_reuse.php)
Catalyst Cooperative, PUDL v2026.9.0, derived from U.S. EIA Forms 860/923
Data transformed by PUDL from U.S. EIA forms; selected fields republished; EIA data is public with dated acknowledgment (https://www.eia.gov/about/copyrights_reuse.php)