A dam's size is not its output
Field note 01, 2024, WA
Why does the biggest dam in the country produce a quarter of what its rating suggests?
Grand Coulee is the largest power plant in the United States by nameplate capacity. In 2024 it generated about a quarter of what that capacity could produce running flat out all year. Here is why the two numbers differ, and what each one is good for.
Capacity is a rating
Source & method
Sum of generator nameplate MW with operational status code OP in the inventory year; one row per generator; unscaled by ownership
2024 inventory · reported · derived · valid · final
33 of 33 operating generators included.
out_eia__yearly_generators.parquet; report_date=2024-01-01; plant_id_eia=6163
Publisher & attribution ↗ Cite this released fact ↗Source & method
Generator rows with status code OP
2024 inventory · reported · derived · valid · final
out_eia__yearly_generators.parquet; report_date=2024-01-01; plant_id_eia=6163
Publisher & attribution ↗ Cite this released fact ↗Every generator carries a nameplate capacity in megawatts (MW). It is the maximum power the unit is rated to produce at one instant. Grand Coulee's operating generators add up to 6,809 MW across 33 count units, as listed in the 2024 EIA-860 inventory. A rating says nothing about how often the units run.
Grand Coulee on the capacity map ↗(opens the atlas in a new tab)
Output is measured over time
Source & method
Sum of EIA-923 annual net generation over the plant's unique prime-mover x energy-source rows; negative values (pumping, station use) retained
2024 calendar year · reported · derived · valid · final
2 of 2 plant x prime-mover x fuel rows included.
out_eia923__yearly_generation_fuel_combined.parquet; report_date=2024-01-01; plant_id_eia=6163
Publisher & attribution ↗ Cite this released fact ↗Net generation is energy delivered over a period, in megawatt-hours (MWh). In 2024 Grand Coulee reported 15,443,458 MWh. The chart shows the reported annual totals since 2015. Years differ because the plant sits on the Columbia River: seasonal runoff varies with snowpack and precipitation [4], and the federal projects are operated for several purposes at once, including flood risk management and fish passage, not only power [3]. Which of those explains a particular year is not asserted from these two numbers; the atlas shows the reported totals and their sources.
Annual net generation · MWh. Bars below zero are negative net generation; a hollow mark means not reported. Missing years are not filled.
Annual values as a table · MWh
| Calendar year | Net generation · MWh | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 18,878,623MWh | reported · final |
| 2016 | 19,011,492MWh | reported · final |
| 2017 | 20,983,990MWh | reported · final |
| 2018 | 21,042,561MWh | reported · final |
| 2019 | 16,639,421MWh | reported · final |
| 2020 | 20,290,172MWh | reported · final |
| 2021 | 18,325,318MWh | reported · final |
| 2022 | 21,176,202MWh | reported · final |
| 2023 | 15,582,026MWh | reported · final |
| 2024 | 15,443,458MWh | reported · final |
Grand Coulee on the generation map ↗(opens the atlas in a new tab)
The ratio is the capacity factor
Source & method
Net generation MWh / (operating nameplate MW x hours in year); only when every operating generator was operating before the year began and none retired during it
2024 calendar year · reported · derived · valid · final
derived: net_generation_mwh@2024 / (nameplate_mw_op x 8784 h)
Publisher & attribution ↗ Cite this released fact ↗Divide the year's energy by what the nameplate could have produced over every hour of the year (8,784 hours in 2024) and you get the capacity factor: 0.258 fraction. For Grand Coulee that is roughly a quarter. A low capacity factor is not a defect. A hydro plant with a large nameplate is valuable precisely because it can produce a lot of power on demand when the water is there, then hold back.
The atlas computes this ratio only when the operating fleet was stable across the year. If a unit started or retired mid-year, the fact reads "not supported" rather than using a denominator that changed.
Who owns and runs it
Source & method
Sum over operating generators of nameplate MW x this organization's ownership fraction (reported schedule or EIA-860 schedule-4 default)
2024 inventory · reported · derived · valid · final
12 of 12 plants included.
out_eia__yearly_utilities.parquet; report_date=2024-01-01; utility_id_eia=2518
Publisher & attribution ↗ Cite this released fact ↗Explore Bureau of Reclamation ↗
The reported operator is Bureau of Reclamation, a federally owned utility [1]. EIA's ownership schedule lists only jointly or third-party owned units; Grand Coulee's units are absent from it and carry ownership code S, so the pipeline applies EIA's rule that such units are wholly owned by the operator and labels the result as derived. Ownership is not the same as who buys the power: the Bonneville Power Administration markets the output of the federal Columbia River dams [2]; the contracts and quantities behind that are not part of this release.
Every plant Reclamation runs or owns ↗(opens the atlas in a new tab)
Where it reports
Partial or uncertain coverage: Reported operating capacity; missing components stay missing
Source & method
Sum of operating nameplate MW over published plants whose reported balancing authority code is this BA; a reporting relationship, not a footprint
2024 inventory · reported · derived · suspect · final
153 of 154 plants included.
Reported operating capacity; missing components stay missing
core_eia__codes_balancing_authorities.parquet; code=BPAT
Publisher & attribution ↗ Cite this released fact ↗Partial or uncertain coverage: 2 plants with operating capacity have no EIA-923 row for the year; their output is unknown, not zero
Source & method
Sum of plant annual net generation over published plants reporting this BA; plants without an EIA-923 row are not counted
2024 calendar year · reported · derived · suspect · final
117 of 119 plants with operating capacity included.
2 plants with operating capacity have no EIA-923 row for the year; their output is unknown, not zero
core_eia__codes_balancing_authorities.parquet; code=BPAT
Publisher & attribution ↗ Cite this released fact ↗Explore Bonneville Power Administration ↗
Grand Coulee reports its operations within the Bonneville Power Administration balancing authority. That is an accounting relationship, not a wire to any customer. The BA's operating nameplate (27,571.3 MW) and reported 2024 generation (95,441,873 MWh) come from summing published plants that report this BA; plants without an EIA-923 row for the year are counted as unknown, not zero.
Hydro plants reporting to BPA ↗(opens the atlas in a new tab)
What this story does not claim
No household is traced to this dam. No monthly curve is invented for annual reporters. Nameplate is never presented as output, and output is never presented as a rating.
Views in this note
Context sources
[1] U.S. Bureau of Reclamation — Grand Coulee Dam, frequently asked questions
Reclamation operates Grand Coulee; the Bonneville Power Administration markets its power
[2] Bonneville Power Administration — BPA power services and the Federal Columbia River Power System
BPA markets power generated at federal dams in the Columbia River Basin
[3] U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Northwestern Division — Columbia River system operations
Federal Columbia River projects are operated for multiple purposes including flood risk management, fish passage and power
[4] NOAA Northwest River Forecast Center — Water supply forecasts for the Columbia basin
Seasonal runoff volumes differ from year to year and are forecast from snowpack and precipitation