PUD No 1 of Klickitat County

Average revenue per kWhRevenue divided by electricity sold. This average is not a tariff or a household bill.Definition ↗ is realized revenue ÷ sales, not a tariff.

WA · commercial

WA · industrial

WA · residential

Sold to retail customers in the stated state (utility x state grain); bundled full-service rows only in the summaries; energy-only and delivery-only rows are listed but never added to bundled sales. Realized average revenue per kWh is not a tariff.

Five kinds kept apart: what applies, what is owed, what the utility filed, what the issuing body decided, and the open proceeding. The disclosed-supply block above is the same utility's fuel mix as Commerce computed it; read it beside these rows, never as a verdict on them. Rows checked through 2026-09-18; a row past its review date is marked, not removed.

Clean Energy Transformation Act RCW 19.405 ↗ · Washington State Department of Commerce (plan adopted by the utility's governing board)

Applicability not yet curated for this utility.

Clean energy implementation plan every four years (RCW 19.405.060) with interim targets; coal out of the allocation by 2025-12-31, greenhouse gas neutral retail sales from 2030-01-01, 100 percent renewable or nonemitting by 2045-01-01

What is owed The obligation as enacted or ordered; a utility’s own restatement does not enact it.

• interim target for the 2022-2025 compliance periodcompiled Washington State Department of Commerce · CEIP Draft Aggregate Workbook 22.12.15.xlsx, sheet Interim targets· of retail electric load

  As the document puts it

  The utility reported a combined total only, with no renewable and nonemitting split. Utility Number in the Commerce workbook is the EIA utility identifier.
  92%2022-2025Source ↗
• eliminate coal-fired resources from the utility's allocation of electricityenacted Washington State Legislature · RCW 19.405.030 Coal-fired resources - Depreciation schedule - Penalties· of the utility's allocation of electricity supplied by coal-fired resources

  As the document puts it

  On or before December 31, 2025. Excludes decommissioning and remediation costs; long-term BPA purchases are exempt unless the electricity is known to be coal-fired. The commission must set depreciation schedules ending no later than 2025-12-31.
  0%2025Source ↗
• greenhouse gas neutral retail sales, at least 80 percent from renewable and nonemitting resourcesenacted Washington State Legislature · RCW 19.405.040 Greenhouse gas neutral electricity supply· of retail sales of electricity to Washington retail electric customers

  As the document puts it

  By January 1, 2030. Up to 20 percent of the obligation may be met by alternative compliance: alternative compliance payments, unbundled renewable energy credits or energy transformation projects. Four-year compliance periods 2030-2033, 2034-2037, 2038-2041 and 2042-2044.
  80%2030Source ↗
• nonemitting generation and renewable resources supply 100 percent of retail salesenacted Washington State Legislature · RCW 19.405.050 One hundred percent renewable and nonemitting electricity supply· of retail sales of electricity to Washington retail electric customers

  As the document puts it

  By January 1, 2045, with an annual demonstration of compliance after that date.
  100%2045Source ↗

What the utility filed Its own report of what it did; a number it reports, not a verdict.

• Not yet curated

  As the document puts it

  The atlas has not curated an assertion of this kind for this utility; this is the atlas's coverage, not the utility's record, and it is not a finding of compliance or of its absence

  The atlas has not curated this kind for this utility; that is the atlas’s coverage, not the utility’s record.

What the issuing body decided Orders and acknowledgments on the filings.

• Not yet curated

  As the document puts it

  The atlas has not curated an assertion of this kind for this utility; this is the atlas's coverage, not the utility's record, and it is not a finding of compliance or of its absence

  The atlas has not curated this kind for this utility; that is the atlas’s coverage, not the utility’s record.

The open proceeding Where the next decision is being made, and how to take part.

• Not yet curated

  As the document puts it

  The atlas has not curated an assertion of this kind for this utility; this is the atlas's coverage, not the utility's record, and it is not a finding of compliance or of its absence

  The atlas has not curated this kind for this utility; that is the atlas’s coverage, not the utility’s record.

Curation and sources

SAIDISystem Average Interruption Duration Index: the minutes of sustained interruption the average customer had over the year, customer-minutes interrupted divided by customers served. Each utility calculates and reports its own figure on EIA-861 Schedule 3, under the method it declares. A system average says nothing about one address.Definition ↗, SAIFISystem Average Interruption Frequency Index: how many sustained interruptions the average customer had over the year, customers interrupted divided by customers served, as the utility reports it on EIA-861 Schedule 3.Definition ↗ and CAIDICustomer Average Interruption Duration Index: minutes per sustained interruption, SAIDI divided by SAIFI on the same basis. EIA-861 asks utilities for SAIDI and SAIFI only; EIA publishes CAIDI with the data and the atlas shows it as published, never recomputed.Definition ↗ count sustained interruptions. Figures with and without major event daysDays a utility sets apart from normal operation: EIA describes them as events such as snowstorms, floods or heatwaves, or periods of outages that differ greatly from the utility's own five-year history. EIA-861 asks for the indices both with and without them. Part B respondents determine them under IEEE 1366; Part C respondents define a major event themselves. The two series answer different questions and are never blended.Definition ↗ are different measures; compare like with like.

WA · Other methodEIA-861 Schedule 3 has two parts. Part B is for utilities that calculate SAIDI and SAIFI and determine major event days under IEEE 1366-2003 or IEEE 1366-2012; Part C is for any other method, where the utility also states how it defines a momentary interruption and whether inactive accounts count as customers. Figures from the two parts are not comparable and the atlas never pools them; utilities under Part C do not share one method either.Definition ↗

• Customers the indices are based on
  14,254 customers
• Highest voltage counted as distribution
  13.2 kV
• How it was measuredDefined by the utility; the form does not collect the definition
  Outages recorded automatically: yes
• Others reporting the same way · major event days included7 utilities in WA under Other method. Each counts once whatever its size; this is context, not a ranking.
  SAIDI median 239.9 (1.2–519) minutes/customer/yearSAIFI median 1.65 interruptions/customer/year
• Others reporting the same way · major event days excluded6 utilities in WA under Other method. Each counts once whatever its size; this is context, not a ranking.
  SAIDI median 161.6 (0.9–384) minutes/customer/yearSAIFI median 1.36 interruptions/customer/year

Reported by the utility on EIA-861 Schedule 3 under the method it declares. IEEE 1366 and other-method figures are not comparable, and values with and without major event days answer different questions. A system average says nothing about one address. CAIDI is published by EIA as SAIDI divided by SAIFI; it is not a line on the form. A value the utility left blank stays blank. Source and licence· Frozen facts for this utility ↗

Programme results as each utility filed them, by customer class and report year, each in its own unit. Classes are never added into a total, years are never added into a period, and savings are never divided by sales. The one ratio shown, enrolled demand-response customers against the utility's own EIA-861 customer count for the same state, class and year, carries both counts.

Energy efficiency EIA-861 Schedule 6 Part A

Reported by the utility on EIA-861 Schedule 6 Part A as adjusted gross savings at the customer meter under its own evaluation; figures are not comparable across utilities. Reporting-year incremental savings are annualized for participants new that year; life-cycle savings run over the programmes' planned life (energy as a lump sum, peak as the average annual reduction). Each class is shown as filed and the total row is the filer's own; nothing is summed here. Costs are nominal dollars of the report year (the form collects thousands; PUDL publishes dollars). A blank stays blank.

Demand response EIA-861 Schedule 6 Part B

A long-form filer with no Schedule 6 row: either no programme, or a separate administrator reports it.

Population: organizations of this release with EIA-861 rows in the core states. A short-form respondent has no figures to file; a long-form respondent without a row may have no programmes or may have a nonutility administrator reporting for it. Years without a row are listed against the table's span, not against the years this utility filed the form.

• Klickitat County PUD #1 ↗reviewed association

Release 20260929T050546Z-51ae0f7d3c78 · Record JSON